lol..Ned's "big idea"...
Posted on 10/30/2006 10:52:35 PM PST by MadIvan
Liberal members of the Democratic Party hailed him as the bright new hope for the American Left after internet activists created the momentum that helped him to slay Senator Joe Lieberman, one of his party's big beasts.
But Ned Lamont has failed to make the transition from plucky underdog to official Democratic nominee. Despite pouring millions from his personal fortune into his campaign to become Connecticut's next senator, he is trailing Mr Lieberman by up to 17 points in opinion polls.
Standing in a half-empty village library, Mr Lamont, a fibre optics entrepreneur, is far from the assured candidate of the summer. Now, even voters in liberal New England are beginning to question whether his strident demands for troops to be brought home from Iraq will make America or the Middle East safer.
"This is a war of ideas," he told supporters in a library in Hamden. "If we stay true to who we are, we win that war."
He acknowledged that "we probably need some troops in order to complete the mission in Afghanistan" but advocated "tough love" in Iraq by leaving the Baghdad government to "take control of their own destiny". In an indication of increasing desperation, he made the unusual claim that Iraq war veterans were being treated worse than those who returned from Vietnam. "We have not shown that same level of respect for the troops coming home now from the troops that came home from Vietnam, frankly."
He cited Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, the Chief of the General Staff, to buttress his case. "The top general from Britain said just last week we're exacerbating the insurgency, British troops are coming home within a year and that's going to put pressure on the Maliki government to make the political compromises that are our best hope for Iraq." In fact, Sir Richard made no commitment to pull troops out within a timeframe.
With his sloping shoulders, a tie that droops down to his navel and a speaking style that comes close to a whine, Mr Lamont is not a politician who inspires confidence. The primary was confined to Democrat voters, but in next week's mid-term elections independents and Republicans, who overwhelmingly back Mr Lieberman, will also go to the polls.
In contrast, the pro-war Mr Lieberman, the Democrats' vice-presidential candidate in 2000, is enjoying a new lease of political life. Having been written off by his foes on the Left when he was defeated by Mr Lamont in August's primary, he now finds himself the potential kingmaker in the Senate. In a case of supreme political irony, it could be his vote that gives the Democrats a majority.
Now an independent, he has promised to caucus with the Democrats but has not ruled out crossing the floor to the Republican side if he is penalised for failing to concede to Mr Lamont. Now that the polls show that he should win, he is every Democratic senator's friend once again.
"I'm a devoted Democrat but independent-minded and I've always worked across party lines to get things done," Mr Lieberman told The Daily Telegraph. "I don't feel I have any obligation to follow party orthodoxy." He remains a strong supporter of the Iraq war, the issue that was his downfall in the primary, but has broadened the debate to what he has achieved for his home state in 18 years in Washington. "During the primary, I let Lamont define me rather than defining myself."
When asked what a defeat for him would mean for the Democrats, Mr Lamont sounded like he was resigned to losing.
"It'll be taken as a strong affirmation of George Bush's policies that, even in Connecticut, Joe Lieberman and George Bush won a majority of the vote."
Ned Lamont is the sone of Corliss Lamont one of the richest and most prominent Communist pushers in the last century.
As for Joe Leiberman, he is a far-left, extreme radical. He has a 95 percent record of voting against conservative ussues in the senate. Leiberman voted against conviction when Clinton was impeached. He is farther to the left than Teddy Kennedy.
lol..Ned's "big idea"...
For Red Ned Lamont: Hamden may have trended liberal over the last few decades [From 1900 to 1967, the Democrats held Town Hall only from 1903-1907 and from 1955-1957] but Ned ought not imagine that his victory there is an automatic. Lieberman is the next door neighbor. Most Hamden Democrats are ethnic Catholics, particularly Italians, and are rather unlikely to favor cowardice in foreign policy.
Yes, he's done the dems liberal bidding, that's his JOB as a dem. And yet consider the GOOD NEWS about CT : if lamont flounders in that liberal cesspool, what does that mean for the rest of the country? The DEM+ONs have been beating their tattered and torn vietnam anti-war drum for how long now? Finally people, even in CT, are realizing that evil prospers when good men do nothing. Since tonite is halloween perhaps many a "perot type" will reconsider their decision to sit out 11/7/6 as a protest, speaker pelosi would be a nightmare, a scary, 2 year long movie they'd rather not see...
Lieberman has ran some very sharp television ads in Connecticut, which have undoubtedly helped his poll numbers.
In one ad he notes how his experience working with the military in the Federal government helped save the Groton submarine base from closing (and all the jobs that go with it). He then notes that Lamont couldn't have possibly have helped save the base.
In another ad, he notes that Lamont invested $5,000,000 in a firm that took jobs out of Connecticut and moved them overseas. In a similar ad, he notes how many people lamont has laid off from his company.
Lieberman stresses working across the aisle.
Meanwhile, Lone-Issue-Lamont keeps repeating the same message of Lieberman=Bush...which only works on the 20% nutjobs.
Yes, it will nice that Lieberman stays in the senate, even as an independent. What does that say about dems when he was at the top of their ticket as VP candidate not too long ago? Again, as a one(left)wing aircraft, the dems are self destructing as a going concern, you can't govern this democracy with just 20% nut-jobs. Yes, we have to put up w/rinos, etc but the CT republicans are making a wise choice by going w/Lieberman, he's a true gentleman that USED to be on the other side of the aisle. Also there's the seniority issue, people understand that when you elect a new senator, he/they start anew at the bottom of the pork-pecking order = BAD NEWS come state-appropriation mark-up time. Our hope here in MT is that independents, even some dems, see why keeping Conrad Burns is so important as to seniority...if nothing else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.