Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I cannot imagine a man of Danforth's integrity favoring it if it allowed for human cloning.

Imagine it. It is in there. The amendment "specifically" bans cloning. Clinton parsing here, it defines specifically that cloning involves implanting fertilized eggs into a womb. By rewriting the definition of what cloning is, anything done outside the womb isn't cloning. Even if it IS.

48 posted on 10/30/2006 6:43:41 PM PST by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant Pancake on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Big Giant Head
Imagine it. It is in there. The amendment "specifically" bans cloning. Clinton parsing here, it defines specifically that cloning involves implanting fertilized eggs into a womb. By rewriting the definition of what cloning is, anything done outside the womb isn't cloning. Even if it IS.

Did I mention that Danforth is also a lawyer? Not exactly one who would get snookered by fine print.

49 posted on 10/31/2006 3:37:27 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson