Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paltz

hmmmm.....maybe the age group was a little young, although the kids ARE getting pregnant at 13 & 14 now instead of the 'ole 16 & 17.

There are plenty of teachers out there pushing the pro-abort message and smearing pro-lifers without getting suspended.

Did this guy show anything that wasn't true?

The item about a baby reaching out for the doctor was not filmed during an abortion - it was filmed during a life-saving surgery while the baby was still in the womb. That child is still alive, and I would think such footage wouldn't be "disturbing" at all.

Are these kids being shown footage of the realities of war in other classes? Are they being shown disturbing images from other historical events?

Give him back his job - have a legitimate debate on what is appropriate for what age.
It sounds like this should be no problem for a high school class.


66 posted on 10/30/2006 7:08:16 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Scotswife
Give him back his job - have a legitimate debate on what is appropriate for what age. It sounds like this should be no problem for a high school class.

I just am floored by the hypocracy shown on this thread. The guy was an ART teacher. He had NO business showing this...it's his agenda. If it were anything else but abortion you guys would not only be calling for his resignation, you'd be calling for criminal charges. When it comes to abortion with you guys, all common sense and propriety go out the window.

68 posted on 10/30/2006 7:16:08 AM PST by Hildy (Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson