[DTogo]

Public schools are no place for R-Rated or X-rated material.

The teacher should be criminally charged as if he had shown the kids a porn movie.

[rwfromkansas]

You don't think R-rated stuff should be shown in school? You are a bit wacko.

There are many movies, especially in history, that would make a big influence on the study of it and help kids understand it better.....and many are R-rated.

Should they be shown in elementary or middle school? No. But, in high school? Yes.

[quiet_reverie]

Abortion is the most common 'surgery' in the United States. Why not enlighten people as to what this very common 'procedure' entails?

[torchthemummy]

Public schools are no place for R-Rated or X-rated material. The teacher should be criminally charged as if he had shown the kids a porn movie.

Let me ask you this: do you think it would require parental permission to vividly describe the gruesome process of abortions (especially partial birth) along with the process of disposal? Would that also be R-rated? Would the questioning of abortion policies/Roe vs. Wade be allowed?

I am just trying to figure out if you are against the showing of this film because of concern for the children or because you are pro-choice.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

Abortion is not porn by any stretch.nobody dies in porn.

[Concerned]

DTOGO WROTE: "Public schools are no place for R-Rated or X-rated material....The teacher should be criminally charged as if he had shown the kids a porn movie."

You mean like when they show OTHER sex-ed videos?