Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: merry10
"Back in the 90s, insurance did not cover CIs plus she was having seizures and I woudl rather have a deaf kid than a brain damaged one (exacerbating it by the implant)."

Insurance paid for mine in 1990. And the implant isn't going to "exacerbate" anyone's seizures or cause brain damage.

Given that your preceding sentence says that your daughter now has a cochlear implant, I presume it all worked out for you and your daughter.
40 posted on 10/30/2006 3:04:56 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Yes, but not enough was known about implants in 1994 for me to rush and get her one. I did nto know she was deaf until July 94. And I did not know what was causing the seizures. I was not going to take any chances.

I work for the federal govt and Cochlear Implant surgery was not covered until 2001 or 2002 under Office of Personnel Managment rules. Believe it was under Bush that the CI surgery was finally covered. But I checked every year, for that and hearing aids, when the plans came up for renewal.

You may find it interesting that House Ear Clinic, when I called in 2002, basically told me to go pound sand when I inquired about an implant for her. Seems as though a signing kid might not do as well with an implant as one who grew up "oral". So I hung up and called UCLA and got into their CI Program. I think she has done well with the CI and within a year, was using phrases like "I see the blue bus", could recognize colors, numbers, and the ling sounds. UCLA"s implant program for us was outstanding.


44 posted on 10/30/2006 3:14:19 PM PST by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson