Stem cell breakthrough for breast cancer patients

The Sunday Telegraph ^ | October 29, 2006 | Staff

[MadIvan]

Note: it's adult stem cells.

Regards, Ivan

[MadIvan]

Ping!

[struggle]

I can research for this quickly being diverted into plastic surgery.

[NonValueAdded]

"ANOTHER SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH BROUGHT TO YOU BY EMBRYONIC STEM CELL ... "

"uh, yes? what was that you said?"

"mmmm, it WASN'T ESCR?"

"from their own bodies you say?"


"NEVER MIND"

[SHOOT THE MOON bat]

Well than it just doesn't count. It only matters if you can created life and than rip it apart for experiments. Just ask Michael J. Frankenstein.

[darthxenu]

Stories like this should get even abortionists to say that stem cell research needs to be focused on adult stem cells. How many treatments have been discovered using embryonic stem cells? I think the only thing embryonic stem cells have been shown to produce successfully are babies. And that's if you leave the embryo in the womb.

[C210N]

My thought exactly. Why, not sure their even starting with breast cancer patients. If they went right to the 'plastic surgury' market, overnite they could completely fund every cancer known and not known to man.

[Bob]

I think the only thing embryonic stem cells have been shown to produce successfully are babies. And that's if you leave the embryo in the womb.

From what I've read, embryonic stem cells are 'successful' in creating cancers at quite an impressive rate.

[nmh]

I also NOTE how they go to great lengths to avoid stating the it is ADULT stem cells. This way they leave the readers confused and go about raising money for EMBYRONIC stem cell research. They want to steal your money and give you false hope through EMBYRONIC stem cells - all the while bemoaning how it COULD help and it COULD be promising - knowing that there is NO promise with EMPRYONIC stem cell research.

In short they want to muddy the water. The godless are mean and nasty. They ENJOY seeing people give money towards NO HOPE and certain demise through disease.

[kalee]

bttt

[airborne]

Note: it's adult stem cells.

It always is!

[MainFrame65]

" == I think the only thing embryonic stem cells have been shown to produce successfully are babies. == "

Unfortunately, not true. They also reproduce without limit, and produce aggressive tumors in great abundance.

[nmh]

"Stories like this should get even abortionists to say that stem cell research needs to be focused on adult stem cells."

No way! Abortionists are in the business of destroying babies any way they can. Embryonic stem cells are fertilized eggs - this is another way to destroy a baby. Plus they may be able to make some money off of embryonic stem cell research through harvesting eggs and fertilizing them - more money and the result is the same - one or more less babies destroyed.

[nmh]

"They also reproduce without limit, and produce aggressive tumors in great abundance."

Absolutely true!

Embryonic stem cells have no promise except that of being a medical nightmare and a paradise for disease. Perhaps God is telling us something ... .

[nmh]

MadIvan, whens the BIG day?

;)

P.S. We also need more conservative kiddies ... ah, after the BIG day!

[sokit2mebb]

That's very exciting for women who have had, or will get breast cancer. It's amazing at all of the things that stem cell research has shown. Hopefully, they will be able to use this same kind of research to combat diseases without having to use aborted babies.

[nmh]

"Hopefully, they will be able to use this same kind of research to combat diseases without having to use aborted babies."

They already have!

THIS article is about ADULT STEM CELLS; NOT EMBROYNIC STEM CELLS! NOTE the difference and where the success has been and continues to be - with ADULT STEM CELLS!

[MadIvan]

MadIvan, whens the BIG day?

Soon.

P.S. We also need more conservative kiddies ... ah, after the BIG day!

First, we need a house to put them in. That is in progress.

Regards, Ivan

[saganite]

It's not big news. These aren't embryonic stem cells.

However, I expect the coming articles by the MSM to cite this as a benefit of stem cell research (they will conveniently obscure the difference between embryonic and adult stem cells as they always do) and then tear into the Republicans and Rush for opposing such research with lines like they would rather see women suffer than support the research. Wait for it.