A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state some kind of historical curiosity, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
But you would think they need to go through some sort of legal process to do this editing, right? Like, say, a constitutional amendment? If judges can just interpret this thing into nonexistence, then we don't really have a constitution, we just have a status quo opinion. This is the biggest reason, I think, why we need to keep the Senate.
Exactly. Which is what the liberals want, a vague, imprecise, generic constitution that can be broadly interpreted to mean whatever a liberal judiciary thinks it should mean. Such a constitution wouldn't be worth the parchment it's written on, and it certainly isn't what the authors created.