And, as HILLARY'S 'PLANS': A DEBATE VIGNETTE documents, hillary's fiasco in the White House was not an isolated event, but rather a reflection of someone who is in over her head, someone who is not only unremarkable and inept, but someone who is not smart enough to see beyond her sense of entitlement to realize it.
When missus clinton ran in 2000, her central pledge to the people of New York was to cure the depression Upstate, but as HILLARY'S 'PLANS': A DEBATE VIGNETTE documents, not only did she not cure the problem, she spent her time writing her 8 mil kickback Simon & Schuster fictionalized memoir and travelling the country selling it, making bookstore, green room, and glitterati pit stops--palm always outstretched as is the clinton way--all this while the problems Upstate festered and grew. Not only did clinton NOT create the 200,000 jobs she promised, her self-serving priorities and her atavistic policies in fact caused Upstate to lose an additional 30,000-70,000 jobs under her tenure.
And this woman thinks she should be returned to office why?
- *
My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president."Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far
away from the White House for the rest of her life."
J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran
fyi
ping
WHAT HAS HILLARY DONE FOR NEW YORK?
A question that an objective media would and should be exploring regularly, especially by directly challenging the candidate.
Of course there is no objective media, only fellow travellers and fifth columnists.
A question that an invigorated opposition would and should be paying to deliver, but Hillary has no meaningful opposition.
We are left then only to perhaps vainly hope, that some natural instinct, some long denied inner voice, of the once proud, once justifiably proud New York voters, will have quietly muttered the defining question of this Year's senatorial election, and that amoung a majority of those who vote, the question will have been answered honestly, from their own knowledge and experience, unmoved by media distortions and distractions and unswayed by focus group tested slogans, and paid propaganda.
Sen. Clinton it is obvious is devoted only to the acquisition of personal power and will tell any lie, and live any charade to hold and acquire political power.
If New Yorkers return this calculating opportunist to the national stage under a banner of their endorsement, they, more than anyone, shall be responsible for the continuing malfeasence, misfeasence and non-feasence that are the hallmarks of any Clinton occupation of office. At a time such as this, when Western Civilisation is under assault by a facist religious movement that supports execution of women who dare to avail themselves of the services of a hairdresser (Taliban policy), those whose loyalties remain fixed in reactionary support of tired political allegiences born of patronage, the unions, the tort lawyers, the welfare state, the communist journalists, the professional left, need to wake up and realize their survival too is at stake. If not, they deserve to be treated as supporters of our terrorist enemies, which is what they will have become, if they allow HRC to remain in political office.