Skip to comments.
GOP ads warn of 'homosexual agenda' from S.F.
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 10/28/6
| Edward Epstein
Posted on 10/28/2006 9:32:50 AM PDT by SmithL
Washington -- Republican charges of a San Francisco "homosexual agenda'' and allegations that a liberal "San Francisco majority'' in Congress would endanger the nation have emerged as themes in the final two weeks of the Nov. 7 midterm election campaign.
The latest salvos are variations on a constant GOP refrain this year, tied to the prospect that House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a "San Francisco liberal,'' would become speaker if Democrats make at least a 15-seat gain in the midterm elections.
"You know, they use me all over the country, my radical homosexual agenda,'' said Pelosi, in San Francisco Friday before heading to campaign stops in Colorado and New Mexico.
"I've never seen a situation where a national party has run against a particular part of the country. It makes me wonder what the Republicans in San Francisco think about the assault that they are making on our city. But it doesn't bother me,'' she said.
A 60-second radio ad by Rep. John Hostettler, R-Ind., who is locked in a tight race with the Democratic candidate, county Sheriff Brad Ellsworth, is the latest attack tied to the anti-Pelosi theme. The ad points out that an Ellsworth victory would help make Pelosi speaker and links the candidate and Pelosi to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the openly gay congressman from Boston.
"Pelosi will then put in motion her radical plan to advance the homosexual agenda, led by Barney Frank, reprimanded by the House after paying for sex with a man who ran a gay brothel out of Congressman Frank's home," says the narrator.
"Go ahead, vote for Brad Ellsworth. Make Nancy Pelosi's day," the ad concludes.
"I don't know what it is,'' Pelosi spokeswoman Jennifer Crider said of the "homosexual agenda" referred to in the ad. "But Barney Frank is the ranking
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; sanfrancisco; sf; tenderloin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
1
posted on
10/28/2006 9:32:51 AM PDT
by
SmithL

Rep. Nancy Pelosi shrugs off the Republican rhetoric and says she's "very, very proud of San Francisco values.''
2
posted on
10/28/2006 9:34:07 AM PDT
by
SmithL
(Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
To: SmithL
Agenda? What agenda?
To: SmithL
The only thing that would make nancy happier was if NAMBLA became th4e official religion in America.
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...
4
posted on
10/28/2006 9:37:23 AM PDT
by
CottShop
(http://sacredscoop.com)
To: SmithL
Republican charges of a San Francisco "homosexual agenda'' and allegations that a liberal "San Francisco majority'' in Congress would endanger the nation have emerged as themes in the final two weeks of the Nov. 7 midterm election campaignAt least, unlike the typical Democrat campaign charge, those two charges are essentially truthful...
5
posted on
10/28/2006 9:38:21 AM PDT
by
Zeppo
To: SmithL
"very, very proud of San Francisco values.'' In other words - hate Christians and if it feels good, do it. Oh, and there is NEVER a tax that is not good.
6
posted on
10/28/2006 9:38:23 AM PDT
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: SmithL
This is the sleaziest year for election campaigns I can remember. Neither party shows anything but desparation.
7
posted on
10/28/2006 9:39:02 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: gcruse
Every election cycle we say the same thing....THIS IS THE DIRTIEST CAMPAIGNING EVER, I DON'T SEE HOW MUCH LOWER THEY COULD GO. and the next election cycle they never disappoint, do they?
8
posted on
10/28/2006 9:40:35 AM PDT
by
Hildy
(Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night.)
To: SmithL
She's the Senator of SF? What about the rest of the state?
9
posted on
10/28/2006 9:43:27 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: Zeppo
At least it is issue based.
10
posted on
10/28/2006 9:44:51 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: gcruse
But I havent heard pelosi demand that webb drop out, is that because she supports his pedophiliac writings? Hmmmmmm
11
posted on
10/28/2006 9:45:15 AM PDT
by
italianquaker
(Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
To: SmithL
It makes me wonder what the Republicans in San Francisco think I'll bet that's the first time she ever had that thought.
To: italianquaker
Exactly. Sometimes you have to hit back hard like exposing Webb's own writings. I personally do not understand freepers that do not want to fight fire with fire sometimes because many ignorant voters are swayed by these type tactics. The house and senate are too important to lose because we wanted to stay above the fray. That is fine unless we do lose, then it is too late.
13
posted on
10/28/2006 9:49:11 AM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: SmithL
And who started it?
Homosexuals have made their sexual habits a public, political issue.
And in this latest elections, it was homosexuals, working for a liberal organization and the DNC, who broke the Foley scandal--which amounted, essentially, to the revelation that he was an evil homosexual.
Foley resigned when he was exposed. Will Pelosi resign?
Payback is tough.
14
posted on
10/28/2006 9:50:44 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SmithL

That's Nancy Pelosi in the back seat with her mom and dad. Notice the cheering crowd. What is wrong with this family photo?
The only visible African American is driving Miss Nancy!!!
Is that Nancy below arriving at her coronation?
To: SmithL
A 60-second radio ad by Rep. John Hostettler, R-Ind., who is locked in a tight race with the Democratic candidate, county Sheriff Brad Ellsworth, is the latest attack tied to the anti-Pelosi theme. The ad points out that an Ellsworth victory would help make Pelosi speaker and links the candidate and Pelosi to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the openly gay congressman from Boston.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
He does play on her team. along with a few other all stars like Rangel and Murtha. Funny how the link between Foley and Speaker Hastert was accepted as a fair game even after Foley had resigned, and this Pelosi linkage, even though true, becomes gay bashing by republicans. These people are really in trouble. I'm beginning to think that between M.J.Fox, Webb, and Pelosi, we may pick up seats. If these guys will just keep talking right up to election day they will ensure their defeat.
To: Paladin2
She's not a Senator. She's in Congress and her district is SF.
17
posted on
10/28/2006 9:52:24 AM PDT
by
Veggie Todd
(Were those magic grits?)
To: italianquaker
She absolutely does support pedophilia- she even stumped for a known pedophile- James Hormell (Yes, the maker of spam in a can) who was a real puke and child predator- she called him a distingushed human being, and she has also stumped for other known NAMBLA advocates- all while accusing the Republicans of not wanting to protect the chiuldren- Nancy pelosi is a despicable human being-
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...
18
posted on
10/28/2006 9:52:25 AM PDT
by
CottShop
(http://sacredscoop.com)
To: SmithL

"I've never seen a situation where a national party has run against a particular part of the country. It makes me wonder what the Republicans in San Francisco think about the assault that they are making on our city. But it doesn't bother me,'' she said.
TRANSLATION: It bothers me - because this ad is true and hurts Democrats in the election.
19
posted on
10/28/2006 9:53:07 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: SmithL
Is the Comical suggesting that Democrats from San Francisco don't follow a gay agenda? I got news for them. Any Democrat in SF who doesn't follow and actively promote a gay agenda is out of office as of the next election. I think the party as a whole would love to take the agenda nation wide.
20
posted on
10/28/2006 9:57:37 AM PDT
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(Everything I need to know about Palestinian nationalism I learned on June 5, 1968.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson