Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pgyanke

"Nancy Pelosi would be second in succession to the Presidency."

Really? There won't be a Vice President?


5 posted on 10/27/2006 8:19:44 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gcruse
Really? There won't be a Vice President?

They call him first in the line of succession...

12 posted on 10/27/2006 8:25:01 PM PDT by pgyanke (We can't share the blessings of peace with those for whom violence is holy imperative. -andy58-in-nh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Really? There won't be a Vice President?

The Vice President in the first in line of Succession.
19 posted on 10/27/2006 8:34:54 PM PDT by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse

She is second in-line of succession.


25 posted on 10/27/2006 8:45:41 PM PDT by Dmitry Vukicevich (Vegetarian: Indian Lingo for lousy hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse; pgyanke
Pgyanke is correct. Pelosi will be second in succession to the Presidency; NOT second in line. The Succession is 1. VEEP 2. Speaker of the House 3. Senate Pro Tem 4. Secretary of State
34 posted on 10/27/2006 8:50:20 PM PDT by no dems (Who to Identify with: The very NAMES say it all. Free Republic or Democratic Underground?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson