Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexKat; maggief; penelopesire

Another Lane Hudson story with additional info.


7 posted on 10/27/2006 5:47:52 PM PDT by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: windchime

WOW....thanks for the ping. trying to catch up here(been out of town the last week). Where is the LSM on this story?


18 posted on 10/28/2006 6:53:07 AM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: windchime; TexKat; maggief

Ethics Report on Foley Not Expected Before Elections


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/27/AR2006102701501.html

Unbelievable! Looks like the only people the 'Ethics Committee' has looked at are Republicans!

From the article in the 'Compost'

"One witness said questions dwelled on meetings between Republican leadership aides, Foley and Foley's staff, and Trandahl.

Outside the committee room, House Republicans, including Hastert, have repeatedly suggested that Democrats should also be scrutinized to determine whether they were aware of Foley's sexually explicit instant messages and leaked them to the news media. But those messages were revealed by former pages only after ABC News published inappropriate but not sexual e-mails, and the committee has not pursued the matter, the witness said."

Go figure....(rolling eyes)


19 posted on 10/28/2006 7:51:21 AM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson