Posted on 10/27/2006 2:49:26 PM PDT by pissant
Wolf Blitzer attempted to sandbag Lynne Cheney today, but that the former Chair of the NEH wasn't buying any of it. Incredibly Blitzer drags the Second Lady of the United States into the dust-up over the novels of James Webb, airing Webb's defense which wrongly drew a comparison between his novels and Lynne Cheney's novel. Blitzer even goes so far as to read the DNC talking points to Cheney, who had been booked to discuss her new children's book, The 50 States. Cheney's outrage is obvious, as is Blitzer's recognition that he had crossed a line which he ought not to have crossed.
Bravo to Mrs. Cheney for chucking it back at Blitzer.
The entire interview will air next hour, but with just this clip CNN is already again exposed as a reliable purveyor of DNC spin. I will post the transcript as it arrives and play it on the air, but if the base needed more motivation, seeing this ambush will provide it. I don't know the circumstances of the invitation tendered to Mrs. Cheney, but it sounds as though CNN had booked her to talk about her book, and then used the time for other purposes.
If you post on this interview, send me a link. Disgust at MSM bias has been mounting throughout the election season, and this is just another though very high profile example of why that disgust exists.
UPDATE: Here is the transcript of the segment that played last hour:
WB: Democrats are now complaining bitterly in this Virginia race. George Allen using novels, novels that Jim Webb, his Democratic challenger, has written, in which there are sexual references. And theyre making a big deal out of this. I want you to listen to what Jim Webb said today in responding to this very sharp attack from George Allen.
LC: Now do you promise, Wolf, that were going to talk about my book?
WB: I do promise.
LC: Because this seems to me a mighty long trip around the merry-go-round.
WB: I want you to respond. This is in the news today, and your name has come up, so thats why were talking about it. But listen to this:
James Webb: Theres nothing thats been in any of my novels that in my view, hasnt been either illuminating the surroundings, or defining a character, or moving a plot. Im a serious writer. I mean, we can go and read Lynne Cheneys lesbian love scenes if you want to, you know, get graphic on stuff.
LC: You know, Jim Webb is full of baloney. I have never written anything sexually explicit. His novels are full of sexually explicit references to incest, sexually explicit references well, you know, I just dont want my grandchildren to turn on the television set. This morning, Imus was reading from the novels, and its triple X rated.
WB: Heres what the Democratic Party put out today, the Democratic Congressional Senatorial Campaign Committee. Lynne Cheneys book featured brothels and attempted rape. In 1981, Vice President Dick Cheneys wife, Lynne, wrote a book called Sisters, which featured a lesbian love affair, brothels, and attempted rapes. In 1988, Lynne Cheney wrote about a Republican Vice President who dies of a heart attack while having sex with his mistress. Is that true?
LC: Nothing explicit. And actually, that is full of lies. Its not its just absolutely not true.
WB: But you did write a book entitled Sisters.
LC: I did write a book entitled Sisters. This description
WB: And it did have lesbian characters.
LC: No, not necessarily. This description is a lie. Ill stand on that.
WB: There is nothing in there about rapes and brothels?
LC: Wolf, Wolf, could we talk about a childrens book for a minute?
WB: We can talk about the childrens book. But I just wanted to
LC: I think our segment is like 15 minutes long, and weve now done ten minutes, so
WB: I just wanted to clarify whats in the news today, give you a
LC: Sex, lies and distortion. Thats what it is.
WB: This is an opportunity for you to explain on these sensitive issues.
LC: Wolf, I have nothing to explain. Jim Webb has a lot to explain.
"Frigging Wolfie Boy is reading, literally, Dem talking points!"
One thing for sure, he didn't read Lynne Cheney's book, "Sisters." Don't you think that before he accused the V-President's wife that he would have taken the time to read the book before quoting Webb as absolute fact?
If that is considered a win over CNN, God bless us.
She handled herself well however after being trapped into the defensive. I do wish she would have left early explaining her reason. The audience had to know there was no intention of discussing her book and she had every reason to thank him gracefully for inviting her but perplexed that she was invited under false pretenses. She then could have left.
Oh Man! That means I'm Rex Woodgate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.