Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tongue-tied
A new defense to a sex crime on a child - Was it intended to be sexual in nature by the predator? Clearly, a new low for liberal defenders of every sexual perversion.

PS - Nice to know you enjoy getting out more to those places were such sexual perversion is common and not considered sexual in nature.
18 posted on 10/27/2006 12:21:06 PM PDT by excludethis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: excludethis
sigh...okay by me if you can't understand that it truly was not sex. That isn't a clintonism, but you'll miss that I feel sure.

Webb isn't someone I want to see elected. I want us to win everywhere we can, and maintain or increase our majority. But attacking him for this doesn't make sense to me.

I've gone where I was told for almost 27 years now and seen some crazy stuff. Some places I've enjoyed--others truly were the pits. But I learned pretty early on that everyone in the world doesn't follow our idea of the norm.
21 posted on 10/27/2006 12:35:50 PM PDT by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson