To: tongue-tied
A new defense to a sex crime on a child - Was it intended to be sexual in nature by the predator? Clearly, a new low for liberal defenders of every sexual perversion.
PS - Nice to know you enjoy getting out more to those places were such sexual perversion is common and not considered sexual in nature.
To: excludethis
sigh...okay by me if you can't understand that it truly was not sex. That isn't a clintonism, but you'll miss that I feel sure.
Webb isn't someone I want to see elected. I want us to win everywhere we can, and maintain or increase our majority. But attacking him for this doesn't make sense to me.
I've gone where I was told for almost 27 years now and seen some crazy stuff. Some places I've enjoyed--others truly were the pits. But I learned pretty early on that everyone in the world doesn't follow our idea of the norm.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson