Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ALERT! N.Y. VOTERS!! HILLARY CLINTON AGAINST NOTIFYING PARENTS WHEN UNDERAGE DAUGHTER SEEKS ABORTION
hillary clinton, Bill O'Reilly, John Spencer, ABC, FoxNews | 10.27.06 | Mia T

Posted on 10/27/2006 10:33:04 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Mia T

bump


61 posted on 10/28/2006 9:21:57 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BTTT


62 posted on 10/28/2006 9:40:04 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Even if you put the morality of the act aside, a parent needs to know the physiological condition of his/her child in order to best care for that child.

BTW...I think a 16-year-old still has to have a parent's written permission to get a tattoo.
63 posted on 10/28/2006 9:43:34 AM PDT by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bannie

Absolutely. It may be unconstitutional; but it's definitely insane.
The dystopian harbinger of the hillary jackboot.


64 posted on 10/28/2006 9:58:46 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

fyi


65 posted on 10/28/2006 10:13:00 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bannie
BTW...I think a 16-year-old still has to have a parent's written permission to get a tattoo.

Varying by state, there are regulations prohibiting children under 14 from using tanning beds. Arizona, Illinois and Ohio require parental permission for anyone under 18 and the trend is growing.

Tatoos, bad for children. Suntans, bad for children. Abortion, no restrictions, at any cost.

Why is abortion so popular with these people?

66 posted on 10/28/2006 11:19:24 AM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: fullchroma

BTTT


68 posted on 10/28/2006 1:40:16 PM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma
This post by Winston, October 17, 2006, 02:11 PM:, provides some insight:

 

..The polls I've seen have shown a clear plurality for Prop 85 and that is a comfort.

..I'm amazed that you can not give a underage child an ASPIRIN fer chrissake!!..but you CAN take her for an abortion without telling the parents. Prop 85 simply states that no doctor can proform and abortion on a minor child until 48 hours after notifying the parents. Simple enough.

..Now the hue and cry springs up...But what about all the abusive, incestuous fathers out there ?? Glad you asked. It will be easy to go to the court if there is danger to the young girl.

..The problem is less one of abortion than statutory rape. In the vast majority of cases the pregnant girl has been impregnated by a male over 18. Typicaly [sic], Planned Parenthood..and other abortion providers..do not report statutory rape to the DA as they should. They think it's a privacy issue. It is covering up a crime, that's all it is.

..The way things are now, a young man can get an underage girl pregnant and then take her to an abortion clinic and get rid of the evidence without notifying the girl's parents. I think the parents have a right to know what their child is doing. They are, after all, responsible for their child. The rights of parents are steadily being erroded. Prop 85 will re-establish the primacy of the Parents in the health decisions of their minor children.

69 posted on 10/28/2006 7:36:49 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

bump


70 posted on 10/28/2006 7:38:13 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jla; Mia T; Gail Wynand; joanie-f; All
Compelling and moving image.

Outstanding imagery and words. Thanks to all contributors.

life

71 posted on 10/30/2006 4:59:17 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson