Your first comment was "They?" which was a reply to post 22, and when I responded you threw me a curve when your thoughts changed back to the main article. Now I know what you're talking about.
I realize you know this, but as with most articles you have to read the article to get the bigger picture. The first sentence of the article says: radical homosexual activists. The term is used at least two more times in the article.
Besides that and as far as I know, Tammy Bruce is the only homosexual that speaks out against the radical homosexual activists. With what the radicals are trying to do to this country and the silence from homosexuals, I don't really have a problem with the title.
There are some millions of homosexuals give or take. And you say Tammy Bruce is the only one who speaks out against radicals. You must not get around much. How many would have to speak out before you would become more objective and exaggerate less?
I don't like the use of hyperbole in headlines to draw people to threads. That's my point.