Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scripter
I think the government has an interest in what's best for our culture

They could set up a department for that -- "The Ministry of Culture". There are plenty of models on which it could be based in the records of the old Soviet Empire.

117 posted on 10/28/2006 8:40:15 PM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b; scripter

What's "government"? Ideally, it's supposed to be what the governed choose, and want. So the governed have voted, in every state that they've had the opportunity, to support marriage (one man and one woman), voting down by huge margins same sex marriage.

So, steve-b, I guess the JBTs (aka "liberaltarians") should force the people to be values neutral, all for their own good of course.

Now just WHO are the nanny staters?


118 posted on 10/28/2006 9:26:11 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b; little jeremiah
That's a great point, lj. What I see happening in the states each time the vote comes up, they vote to support traditional marriage and the family. Perhaps steve-b would call that the old Soviet Empire but I'd call it the best thing for the future of this nation.
119 posted on 10/28/2006 10:42:25 PM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

There is an axiomatic state of human reproductive biology and anything beyond that is purely a fetish, something the state should have no interest in sanctioning as codified into secular law.

No man may become a law unto himself under the guise of freedom of religion.

It was landmark U.S. Supreme Court precedent Reynolds v. United States in 1878 that made “separation of church and state” a dubiously legitimate point of case law, but more importantly; it confirmed the Constitutionality in statutory regulation of marriage practices.


121 posted on 10/29/2006 12:45:40 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson