Skip to comments.
Maliki and the GI (The Madhi Army believed to behind US soldier kidnapping)
Wall Street Journal ^
| October 27, 2006
Posted on 10/26/2006 9:44:27 PM PDT by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
10/26/2006 9:44:28 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
Now can we kill them???????
2
posted on
10/26/2006 9:47:28 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
To: jmc1969
Stunts like this will have even the diehards clamoring to leave after a while.
3
posted on
10/26/2006 9:48:45 PM PDT
by
misterrob
(Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
To: jmc1969
Mahdi Army + flame throwers = need now!
4
posted on
10/26/2006 9:50:01 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Democrats. French, but more cowardly.)
To: jmc1969
Mookie's head on a pike and his body fed to pigs would do much to quiet Iraq.
5
posted on
10/26/2006 9:53:59 PM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
To: jmc1969
They picked a weak leader.
6
posted on
10/26/2006 10:02:30 PM PDT
by
Hoosier-Daddy
(It's a fight to the death with Democrats.)
To: Hoosier-Daddy
The Iraqi people didn't pick Maliki, Sadr and Hakim and their blocks in parliment picked Maliki.
Bremer let the UN pick the electoral system for Iraq, and the UN ended up chosing the worst possible system for Iraq.. List PR.
7
posted on
10/26/2006 10:04:32 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: peyton randolph
Go Roman on the SOB! I agree. Times up.
8
posted on
10/26/2006 10:06:01 PM PDT
by
Mr.Atos
(http://mysandmen.blogspot.com)
To: Allegra; Marine_Uncle
Sadr needs to pay for this.
9
posted on
10/26/2006 10:08:02 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: Hoosier-Daddy
And that is going to make or break this costly effort. I'm thinking a fresh start is needed or just work on rest of country and let Baghdad stew.
10
posted on
10/26/2006 10:08:14 PM PDT
by
mcshot
("If it ain't broke it doesn't have enough features." paraphrased anon.)
To: jmc1969
Enough already, our government supporting one backstabbing Iraqi government after another. Bush should announce to the world that American lives were spent to rid the world of Saddam and now the rest is up to the Iraqis. How many months or years are we going to hang around getting murdered on their streets and highways while we pretend that these people are going to wake up and be willing to climb out of the dark ages and provide for their own defense. The vast majority of these people are only concerned with prostrating themselves in a mosque of some kind where they are constantly being told to go out and murder more americans.
Let us declare that we had the victory of ridding the world of Saddam (a good deed, if there ever was one) and get the hell out with a warning that if they create another Saddam, we will hold the entire people of Iraq responsible and there will be no precision bombing the next time around. Hopefully we will never again try to bring freedom and democracy to a people who have no understanding nor ability to work with such a system. I thought most conservatives knew the fallacy of do goodism. Unfortunately GWB isn't a conservative and never learned.
11
posted on
10/26/2006 10:36:29 PM PDT
by
brydic1
To: brydic1
Democracy isn't the evil in Iraq.
How we set up democracy in Iraq was the evil. We should have kept Allawi in power until Iraq was stable and he built up checks to keep religious leaders from being able to simply issue fatwas telling people who to vote for.
We needed to give Allawi the leeway to do like Egypt and Jordan do and keep a leash on the religious leaders.
12
posted on
10/26/2006 10:45:46 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
Like we hadn't figured that one out! Stick the pig!
13
posted on
10/26/2006 10:51:24 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: jmc1969
Ollie North said Sadr should be taken out...but by an Iraqi. Of course, I wonder who is providing security for Maliki? If it's us, then we could be lax there and see how he likes it.
14
posted on
10/26/2006 11:01:41 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: jmc1969
15
posted on
10/26/2006 11:03:02 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
(Virtual Fence - only the tax dollars are real)
To: brydic1
The clue was when they kept Islamic law in their constitution. I didn't hold out much hope after that, but couldn't bring myself to give up all hope.
16
posted on
10/26/2006 11:04:14 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: jmc1969
I certainly agree with you on that. I prefer representatives of geographical districts to this party list idea.
17
posted on
10/26/2006 11:05:57 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: Maynerd
I agree with Peters. Sadr has to go NOW. If Maliki wants to go with him, oh well.
18
posted on
10/26/2006 11:10:01 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: jmc1969
We should have wacked that fat P.O.S. back in 2003 or 2004 when we have him cornered like a rat in Sadr City. Every time we try to be 'respectful' of theri local leaders, we end up with dead Marines. There is no individual life in Iraq worth the life of another Marine. Sadr needs to meet Allah and answer for his crimes.
19
posted on
10/26/2006 11:12:25 PM PDT
by
bpjam
(Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
To: jmc1969
An even bigger mistake: We should have been (assisting Iraqis in) the building of democracy YEARS BEFORE the war began. The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 provided the mandate and the funds to do this.
By the time we went to war with Saddam we should have had a Free Iraqi government operating for several years in the No-Fly zones, and likewise a Free Iraqi army at least a few thousand strong. It doesn't take much hindsight to envision the HUGE differences had we a functioning government-in-exile to which we could have transfered sovereignty almost immediately, and had thousands of armed and trained Iraqis participated in the liberation of their own country. Indeed the existence and operations of Free Iraqi elements in the No-Fly zones might have leached power from Saddam over the years to a degree that war might not even have been necessary.
Those in the State Department, CIA and elsewhere who systematically and intentionally undermined and subverted the Iraq Liberation Act have the blood of thousands on their hands. They should be identified, tried and shot.
20
posted on
10/26/2006 11:19:36 PM PDT
by
Stultis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson