Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redangus
"You have obviously never really seen a true HD picture. Comparing a 17 inch $200 set and picture to $2000 big screen HD picture and set is like saying that there is no difference between looking out a dirty window and opening the window. I have both a 26 inch SDTV and a 47 inch HDTV hooked up to DTV and there is no comparison between the picture quality and sound."

Did I say 17"? I thought I said 27".

I have seen every kind of HD picture known to Best Buy and Circuit City. Yes, the picture quality is better, but not enough better to make me spend a few grand so that 15% of my viewing can be a little better.

I'm not dissatisfied with my regular TV, DirecTV, DVR setup. It works great and looks good. I really don't like "theater" sound for most viewing. It sort of like the Betamax vs. VHS thing. Beta was better, but not enough better to justify the cost. I think that's why the HDTV adoption rate has been slow. The new technology has to be enough better to make people dissatisfied with what they have.
48 posted on 10/26/2006 9:00:54 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Poser

That is what is so great about America everyone is entitled to make their own choices. I Personally couldn't go back to watching SD if HD is an option. I switched from cable to DTV because of the superior SD quality and HD offerings. I also get my locals in HD along with ESPN/2, DiscoveryHD, TNTHD and others and love it. If you are satified with what you've got that is great, to each his own;).


86 posted on 10/27/2006 8:45:28 AM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson