Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Johnny is reading Islamist propoganda
WorldNetDaily ^ | October 26, 2006 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 10/26/2006 4:42:52 AM PDT by Man50D

Islam is being taught in the nation's public schools as a religion to be embraced because "organized Islamists have gained control of textbook content," according to an organization that analyzes textbooks.

The American Textbook Council has concluded that the situation is the consequence of "the interplay of determined Islamic political activists, textbook editors, and multiculturally minded social studies curriculum planners."

It has gone so far that correcting the situation now becomes a problem, because "educational publishers and educational organizations have bought into claims propounded by Islamists – and have themselves become agents of misinformation."

That comes from Gilbert T. Sewall, who not only wrote the organization's report on Islam and textbooks, but also generated a response to the flood of criticism he encountered.

William J. Bennetta, author of The Textbook Letter and a fellow of the California Academy of Sciences, also has documented dozens of instances of advocacy for or against a belief system, and has produced a list of books where the "religion preaching" leaves them "unfit for use."

Indeed, Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes even has repeatedly expressed concern about the "privileging of Islam in the United States" and warns the stakes go well beyond 7th-grade texts. His opinion of Houghton Mifflin's "Across the Centuries? Full of "apologetics" and "distortions."

WND recently reported on a case in Oregon where parent Kendalee Garner objected to having her son being taught Islam, including the memorization of the "Five Pillars" of Islam and dressing up as a Muslim.

That episode followed a U.S. Supreme Court decision just a few weeks ago not to review a lower court's ruling that a similar class requirement in the Byron Union School District in California, where students were instructed to "become Muslims" was "cultural education."

WND also has reported that a man arrested as a terror suspect for allegedly trying to transport $340,000 from a group tied to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, and who reputedly had connections to Osama bin Laden, helped write the "Religious Expression in Public Schools" guidelines issued by President Clinton during his tenure in office.

Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was president of the American Muslim Council and a supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, worked with President Clinton and the American Civil Liberties Union when the guidelines, guidelines later used by a federal judge to conclude such teaching was legal, were compiled.

Sewall said in his elaboration that his study showed world history textbooks "hold Islam and other non-Western civilizations to different standards than those that apply to the West" even while "Islamic pressure groups and their allies seek to suppress the critical analysis of Islam inside and outside classrooms."

Such textbooks result when "nervous publishers" obey educational fashion and rely more heavily on diversity experts than on trustworthy scholarship, he said.

"Textbook editors seem not to recognize that a school-related Islamic agenda in the U.S. uses multiculturalism as a device to guarantee a purely favorable and uncritical view of all things Muslim. At extremes, the report suggested, multiculturalism contributes to a form of peaceable cultural jihad meant to discredit or 'problematize' European civilization in favor of non-Western cultures," he wrote.

The ATC describes itself as an independent national research organization set up in 1989 to review the history and social studies textbooks used in the nation's schools.

Also contributing to the criticism is the work of Bennetta, whose conclusions are available at He finds that textbooks from a wide range of many of the best-known publishing houses used in public schools today simply shouldn't be there.

"When we examine the textbooks that major publishers try to sell to public schools, we sometimes find fraudulent passages that function as instruments of religious indoctrination: Religious myths are depicted as accounts of real people and events, religious superstitions are depicted as matters of fact, and the origins of religious writings are obscured or are wrapped in outright lies," Bennetta wrote.

"These passages of religious propaganda have been devised by individuals or groups that seek to use the public schools for spreading their own sectarian doctrines and for recruiting converts. In various cases, publishers evidently have accepted material from religious pressure groups and have put the material into textbooks, even though it is laden with blatant preaching, miracle-mongering and fake 'history,'" he wrote.

Bennetta, who is equally adamant that no religious beliefs be included as preaching in textbooks, cites a Houghton Mifflin book "Across the Centuries" as having a lot of Muslim "propaganda." He said the 1999 version has one thing an earlier edition didn't: an apparent source.

Listed as a consultant is "Shabbir Mansuri, Founding Director, Council on Islamic Education, Fountain Valley, California."

Bennetta said the CIE is "a conspicuous Muslim outfit that evidently specializes in inducing schoolbook-writers to sanitize and eulogize Islam, to retail Muslim religious claims as facts, to retail Muslim woo-woo as history, and to depict Islam as an amicable religion that resembles, and is compatible with, Judaism and Christianity."

He said other texts and publishers for which he's found a basis for criticism include "Human Heritage: A World History" by Glencoe/McGraw-Hill; "A Message of "Ancient Days" by Houghton Mifflin; "Across the Centuries" by Houghton Mifflin; "Heath World History: Perspectives on the Past" by McDougal Littell; "Ancient World" by McGraw-Hill School Division; "Making Thirteen Colonies" by Oxford University Press, "World History: Continuity and Change" by Holt, Rinehart and Winston; and "World Cultures: A Global Mosaic" by Prentice Hall, among others.

Sewall said in his treatise that older textbooks didn't so much misrepresent Islam as neglected and ignored it. Now, those same textbook publishers have moved from ignorance to "self-censorship."

For example, a concern raised by Swarthmore historian James Kurth notes "the possibility of structural incompatibility between Islam and the American polity" because of the resistance of American Muslims to assimilate.

"These scholars should at least obtain a fair hearing. They do not," Sewall concluded.

And, he said, the California-based Council on Islamic Education director Shabbir Mansuri concluded the ATC was an "extremist" organization for issuing a report on such concerns, even though there's no evidence of that.

Houghton Mifflin's chief publicist, Collin Earnst, also criticized the report, suggesting that such "bias has misled the public into believing that Islam is a barbaric and murderous religion."

Earnst told WND that his company has a careful process for obtaining input on books, reviewing that input, and then deciding what should be published. Where issues of "belief" by a religious group are involved, reasonable citations and attribution are included, he told WND.

He said among the groups used for comment in the past have been Hadassah and the Christian Educators Association.

But Sewall said there were no such conclusions in his report. "The publisher made these cynical claims to deflect attention from the source of the problem: the textbooks themselves."

He cited one passage from Houghton Mifflin's "Patterns of Interaction":

"In Islam, following the law is a religious obligation. Muslims do not separate their personal life from their religious life, and Islamic law regulates almost all areas of human life. Because of this, Islamic law helped to bring order to Muslim states. It provided the state with a set of values that shaped a common identity. In addition to unifying individual states, law helped to unify the Muslim world. Even though various Muslim states might have ethnic or cultural differences, they lived under a common law." That, Sewall said, "conveys nothing." Further, it never explains that sharia bears "no resemblance to U.S. law, which grew out of the British constitution."

Other criticism came from the report's concerns over why Muslims so often don't get along with neighbors. "Looking at Algeria, Nigeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines, for example, where religious wars are being conducted today against infidels, this proposition is more than plausible," Sewall wrote.

In the California case that was litigated, Edward White III, of the Thomas More Law Center wondered, "Would it have been 'just cultural education' if students were in simulated baptisms, wearing a crucifix, having taken the name of St. John and with praise banners saying 'Praise be to Jesus Christ' on classroom walls?"

From Nyssa, Ore., where one parent raised objections to the Islamic teachings, Supt. Don Grotting, said the text includes assignments for students to learn the "Five Pillars" and study Ramadan.

Grotting acknowledged to WND that textbooks do "take a slant" on some issues, because publishers "are wanting to sell a textbook that is meeting the needs of the state and federal mandates."

And in the California case, school officials also blamed the "possible cant" of the textbook.

Sewall said textbooks in America should "explain the historically potent strain of Islam that promotes separatism and theocracy. Instead, they are trying to trim history to please Islamic pressure groups and allied ideologues.

"The implications for U.S. civic education are immense, especially if students are unaware of or even accept the idea that for politically esthetic reasons they are being lied to or emotionally manipulated."

"If our nation's cultural underpinnings are in conflict with religious dogma and values that are intent on replacing or even eradicating them, should not children and their teachers be made aware? Just as pro-Soviet enthusiasms, Mao worship, and Cold War revisionism seem naïve today, currently prescribed views of Islam may also some day seem like dangerous nonsense. And what key points might replace the obvious flaws in the current generation of textbooks? That militant Islam is a real force in the world today, an insurgency that is a real threat to the nation's democratic way of life and freedoms that its citizens often take for granted."

"Today, Christmas and Nativity scenes are outlawed while Clinton's nominee, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton, recently approved 'Islam: A Simulation' where children learn to become Muslim, recite the Quran, fast for Ramadan and pray to Allah including this prayer: 'In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful. Praise be to Allah, Lord of Creation, The Compassionate, the Merciful, King of Judgment-day! You alone we worship, and to You alone we pray for help, Guide us to the straight path,'" wrote Jen Shroder, on her website.

"America does not comprehend Muslim resolve to make America Islam," Shroder wrote. "Suicide bombers have already demonstrated their willingness to kill and die for it."

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brainwashing; islam; propaganda; textbooks

1 posted on 10/26/2006 4:42:53 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D
There is bias through-out textbooks. They are written to make money. They are written to meet the criteria written by the states (in adoption states) or by the larger districts (in open territory).

Sometimes, where they are based also has an impact. PH is British-based. Holt is in Austin, TX. Glencoe is in Ohio. I think another is in Boston.

2 posted on 10/26/2006 4:48:35 AM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Holy Carp!!!

3 posted on 10/26/2006 4:49:24 AM PDT by cobaltblu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Again I make the promise to myself- I promise to keep my 6 year old boy in a Christian private school even though I have trouble affording it. I make this promise everytime I hear one of these idiotic stories about public schools.

4 posted on 10/26/2006 4:51:21 AM PDT by alienken (Bumper sticker idea- We have God in heaven & a Texan in the whitehouse,LIFE IS GOOD!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Like I posted yesterday: The one thing I can say about the muslims is that they are strategically very smart. They recognize the importance of education. By infiltrating schools, universities and colleges with their death cult philosophy, and by synergizing the left's moonbat anger, which parallels their own, they are creating a learning environment receptive to their trash, where their propaganda will fill the minds of the future leaders in this country. The muslims are trying to gain an intellectual foothold and desire to create a generation of pro-muslim useful idiots.

5 posted on 10/26/2006 5:04:42 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Mr. Unruh needs spell check.
It's "propaganda".

6 posted on 10/26/2006 5:06:24 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Everybody's talking 'bout the stormy weather / And what's a man do to but work whether it's true?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

"Houghton Mifflin's chief publicist, Collin Earnst, also criticized the report, suggesting that such "bias has misled the public into believing that Islam is a barbaric and murderous religion."

Umm, no. Bias in books or groups wasn't what convinced me that Islam is a barbaric and murderous religion. I believe 9-11 did that quite well by itself.

Seriously, the textbook-education school complex is a threat not only to religious tolerance and understanding but also to our children's historical perspectives. Companies and textbook editors do everything they can to increase sales, which means convincing school book buyers that books must be constantly updated, pushing the books in the education classes the writers and editors teach, adding bells and whistles to jazz the books up.

The result is school districts feel pressure to buy the latest (unvetted) very expensive books but can't afford enough to let the kids take the books home so only classroom copies are available. In those instances where kids can take books home, they are required on day one to make covers so they won't mar the multi-colored, expensive book bindings.

It is a system that makes the old military-industrial complex look sickly by comparison. Any parent should carefully vet, if possible, not only the history texts but any textbook. Propaganda hides everywhere in math books, English books, science books, in the choice of reading assignments, in the films watched. Education used to be a partner with parents in protecting our children. No longer. It's an adversarial relationship now.

7 posted on 10/26/2006 5:12:41 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Mr. Unruh needs spell check.

It's "propaganda".

It's sad to think you consider the most important aspect of the article is a misspelled word.
8 posted on 10/26/2006 5:23:13 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Not at all. The article is in itself quite interesting.

However, this is the type of sloppiness I'd expect from WND.

9 posted on 10/26/2006 5:24:57 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Everybody's talking 'bout the stormy weather / And what's a man do to but work whether it's true?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

It's kind of an in your face. So I don't spell right. What's it to ya. Redneck verve. Rah for the redneckx.

10 posted on 10/26/2006 5:28:00 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The more the left successfully removes Christianity and Judaism from American life, the more the head-choppers move in.

11 posted on 10/26/2006 5:34:33 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Jihadism: destroy Western Civilization and replace it with sharia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Should we surrender now? We've got an educational establishment that stands for nothing.

12 posted on 10/26/2006 6:18:21 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Should we surrender now? We've got an educational establishment that stands for nothing.

Two words: Home schooling.
13 posted on 10/26/2006 6:19:54 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
In a related story, a one-man operation has been identified by authorities doing the same thing, using public transportation instead of text books.
14 posted on 10/26/2006 7:11:39 AM PDT by loungitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson