Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
No, he's not. Charles wants to change his name to George, for example.

Well, seeing how well George III did, this sounds like a great idea.

108 posted on 10/26/2006 12:28:22 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Politics ain't beanbag. Make it a Rovetember to remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: NeoCaveman
George V was a bedrock of strength for the nation during World War I. George VI was similar during World War II.

That should be enough for us - we don't need Charles to come along and ruin the improvement in the Georges - inevitably, there will be another one at some point. Let's wait for someone worthy to be George VII.

Regards, Ivan

110 posted on 10/26/2006 1:20:28 PM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson