--"Via computer simulation based on statistical analysis of historical data, we show how generic vote polls can be used to forecast the election outcome.--
Replace "generic vote polls" with "global climate data".
Then replace "election outcome" with "future climate change" and you have a strong argument that the global warming hysteria is also pure crap.
In both cases, the libs can massage their shaky statistical data to predict their desired outcome. It all gives a new meaning to the term "political science".
The sad truth about this matter, is that most of these individuals couldn't find their @$$ with both hands.