Replies

The media was not nearly as biased in 2004 as it is today. In fact most of the time it quoted polls showing Bush leading.

This time it is much different. The media in 2004 attributed negative stories about Republicans and George Bush to Democrats. This year they are just stating them as absolute facts.

There were few if any stories that said the Democrats were going to win the house and the senate in 2004. This time every newscast has a story about Democrats wining anywhere from 25 to 48 seats in the house.

If you can't see the difference between this years election and the 2004 race then you are not watching TV.

IN fact in 2004 Dan Rather was caught running untruthful stories. We caught him on Free Republic but the rest of the media except CBS picked it up and covered what Rather had done.

This year they are not covering things like Reid making a million dollars on land he did not own. There is a huge difference and you apparently are unable to see it.

Which only proves that the media is very effective at fooling those on the right. They claim they can.. and you prove they have that power.