Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftless2

I disagree.

The clintons are ruthless, lucky (e.g., had Bush 41 not been so popular after the Gulf War, clinton would not have had the opportunity to run, especially after that soporific keynote address in '91).

They are not nearly as bright as their PR would have us believe.... We must take them seriously because they are ruthless and they have power, not because they are bright.


39 posted on 10/25/2006 5:54:20 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: driftless2; All
had Bush 41 not been so popular after the Gulf War, clinton would not have had the opportunity to run, especially after that soporific keynote address in '91

... and I suspect the Ds regret this more than we do.

42 posted on 10/25/2006 6:00:52 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Allen; All

ping


56 posted on 10/25/2006 7:02:17 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson