by Mia T, 10.25.06
MORE SOON ON DEBATES
Posted on 10/25/2006 3:47:37 AM PDT by Mia T
|
by Mia T, 10.25.06 MORE SOON ON DEBATES |
|
SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
QUESTION: When was the last time you observed "the smartest woman in the world"2 partake in our process of political discourse, or, as Charles Kuralt once put it, relish in "the raucous give and take of American democracy?" ANSWER: Never. Hillary-the-person answers to no one.3
Hillary-the-person never shows her face. Hillary-the-person never talks. Part of the reason is substance-- or more precisely, the lack of it: The clintons are a truly banal bunch. But, as the husband amply demonstrates, banality, in and of itself, is not a nonstarter if you have a semblance of style. But, sadly, missus clinton doesn't have that, either.
The upshot of all this vacuity are positive numbers for hillary (such as they are) that are inversely related to appearance frequency, and, more specifically, inversely related to the following mouth variables: magnitude of agape, amplitude and frequency of effluvia.4
The bottom line is this paradox: In order for hillary clinton to have any chance of winning elections, she must all but vanish from the public stage.5
Howard Wolfson is the current model.
If the problem has already taken root, she plants false news stories about it. (Missus clinton's sorry sock-puppet status falls into this category.) 6
It is only when her power, treasure or freedom appears in imminent danger does she deign7 to put the lie10 in our face herself.8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
A Little Lulu bump. . .
Hmm. . Now I know who the wicked witch was in my Little Lulu comic books . . .--Twinkie
Indeed. Check especially page 2, last 4 frames.
The cookies notwithstanding, sure sounds like hillary clinton and her ruthless, reckless, liberal scheme to me.... ;)
thanx, malia :)
bttt
thanx, nopardons. :)
Worse: According to press accounts, America's young Monicas weren't just having oral sex; they were having it in circumstances that would raise Hugh Hefner's eyebrows. In July 1998, The Washington Post ran a front-page story with the headline, "Parents Are Alarmed by an Unsettling New Fad in Middle Schools: Oral Sex."
"Ya know" - I have always believed Juanita as well as the rest of the women who have come forth to expose the smarmy Bill Clinton. He is more than capable of rape, probably far worse things. Hillary's emptiness shows up time and time again in her utter disregard for women, the very ones she says she cares about. She doesn't! It is all about getting the feminist vote. Those very same “feminists” showed their disregard for themselves when they gave the rapist a pass – intellectually they destroyed themselves with their shameless passivity about Bill Clinton and his merry enabler, Hillary. These two rock stars (my apologies to real rock stars) have dumbed down the American electorate long enough….Grow Up Clinton people!
Democrats have also let George Soros take over their once meaningful party and turned it into a hateful, blame America first third world party of the most sordid kind.....Clintonitas is a dreadful disease, sort of a demise that leaves them valueless and empty, chasing after Kyoto type agendas, cloning, abortion, same sex marriage, global warming to the extreme, willing to let the terrorists take as many lives as necessary to keep the “peace”. Hillary is nothing more than a cloned idea of Hollywood and the media……an empty pant suit being rammed down our collective throats daily has had a numbing effect like Novocain. Hopefully the Novocain will wear off in time to fully recognize what a thoroughly sinister person the real Hillary is. Ever wonder what the constant bug eyed insincere, mouth open looks you get from Hillary and Nancy Pelosi are really all about…..? Power, money, greed.
How numb are you New York? Want a senator for your state or a power hungry, back stabbing female whose word is zilch and whose spouse is a rapist and a louse? - Someone who will be working for herself instead of New Yorkers while she steps over the bodies on her way to the Oval Office - are you such groupies and rock star blind to see the truth? Or do you want a Real American and a Real New Yorker for your REAL SENATOR? Dump the empty suit while you can.
Is that Nancy Pelosi on the broom behind the big witch? Ooooh! and I had forgotten how much Tubby resembled der Schlickmeister, but I always remembered Tubby as a decent sort. . . maybe he grew out of the "unfortunate" resemblance! We can only hope, for Lulu's sake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America in the looking glass
By Craige McMillan
We now know -- a year late, thanks to The Washington Post -- that while Congress investigated President Clinton's sexual proclivities in the Oval office, seventh and eighth-graders in Washington, D.C.'s exclusive suburban middle schools were looking into the subject, too. ("Parents Are Alarmed by an Unsettling New Fad in Middle Schools: Oral Sex," by Laura Sessions Stepp, The Washington Post, A1, July 8, 1999). "What's the big deal? President Clinton did it," one of the girls told her mother. "They would argue they were acting responsibly," another mother said, voicing concerns about AIDS and abstinence. "Adolescents as young as 11 are not prepared for its emotional repercussions," the Post wrote, quoting Beth Knobbs, director of pupil services in Talbot County. "It's now the expected minimum behavior," said Michael Schaffer, health-education supervisor in Prince George's County for the past 15 years. But it won't take Mr. Schaffer's full 15-year career for the sexually-transmitted diseases -- gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes -- to appear in his young charges. And another 15 years won't erase all the emotional scars. "The times, they are a'changing," proclaimed a popular ballad from the 1960s. And it looks like the changes, Mom and Dad, they have arrived. Your "young adolescent" son or daughter was only five or six when the Bill and Hillary's political and media elite proclaimed "character doesn't matter." It was all the permission much of America needed to elect as first family the couple who mirrored their own values. Did your son or daughter hold your hand and go into the voting booth with you, while you pulled the lever or punched the dots for "it's the economy, stupid" Bill Clinton and Al Gore? Parents will appreciate the intimate setting their children chose for their activities. Quoting the Post:
The Post characterized these activities as "relationships" and said they might "last a couple of weeks or fizzle in a few hours." A Reston seventh-grader even "attempted to arrange oral sex dates between classmates for money." A lot of vice cops would be more plain in how they characterized such a "relationship." "Young adolescents have difficulty negotiating sex in a relationship," explained Columbia University sociologist Peter Bearman to the Post. "Girls in eighth grade are particularly vulnerable because relating to boys has never been more important." "I didn't really know what it was," an eighth grade girl who found herself with a boy she "kinda liked" at a party told the Post. But he showed her. "I realized pretty soon that it didn't make him like me," she said. Maybe that's because what eighth grade girls really want is a Mom to explain what's happening to her body -- and a Dad to wrap his familiar arms around her and say, "I love you sweetheart. Now tell me -- what did you learn in school today?" But Mom's career meant she didn't have the time. And her salary helped to make the mortgage payments on a house they couldn't really afford. Maybe that was the evening, like so many others, that Dad had to work late again, or have dinner with a client, or sat in traffic as he and his SUV clones stared past one another on city streets and freeways. No, it isn't any fun. But somebody's got to make the car payments, and a private school isn't cheap. Why, I wonder, do we expect bad trees to deliver good fruit? We wring our hands and fret that schools might endorse the Judeo-Christian values that gave them birth, yet we have no problem when those same schools endorse seventh-grade sex by passing out how-to manuals in "health class" and condoms from the principal's candy jar. We teach Billy and Judy that all truth is relative -- and that their relatives evolved from pond scum. We suppress any mention of the Grand Designer, and yet act surprised when little Billy and Judy adopt our distorted worldview. Mom and Dad tell pollsters that our president's sex life while on the public payroll and representing our nation in the Oval office is his own business, but the same parents have "tears in their eyes" when they learn from a middle-school principal that their thirteen-year-old daughters have acted on Mom and Dad's clearly expressed beliefs. Perhaps the pain comes from the memories. Maybe the parents crying in that classroom as the truth rang in their ears were the ones who earlier looked into a daughter's innocent five-year-old eyes as she held Mom or Dad's hand in the voting booth, and abruptly dismissed her childish little question: "Mommy, what's character -- and why doesn't it matter?" Craige McMillan is a commentator for WorldNetDaily. |
|
|
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
Oh, I love it! Haven't seen Little Lulu in a long time, and now I'm one of Witch H's weary traveler cookies. Little did I know then . . sigh . . . Lulu, Lulu, break the spell . . break the spell . . . !!
Women--everyone--must understand that missus clinton, certainly not a 'victim,' was not some poor, passive enabler either in the clinton rape(s).
She is an abuser of women in her own right.
;)
ping
I keep thinking every time I see that scratchy Hillary Moribund Loser bumper sticker looking thingy at the bottom of the post - at last, a bumper sticker worthy of Hillary (uh, well, really actually maybe a bit TOO good for her).
bttt
"Bump...dagnabbit!"
;)
8^) "Happy Hallo Weenies!"
thank you :)
Lulu lives forever in a different world from the Witches.
ANOTHER CLINTON HOSING OF AMERICA IN 2006? IN 2008?
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU. FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.
Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (
