Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bonaparte
Not much subtlety to Judge Change, is there? She lets Brown get away with evading service, then later invokes the 16-day rule to keep him in the election. I can see why Gray Davis liked her.

Didn't matter - no preliminary injunction was forthcoming to prevent the counting of Brown's votes - voting already began, and any further remedies can come post-election. No judge, no where, will step into that minefield, especially after the SCOTUS's clear language that interfering in elections was something that courts were to avoid.
14 posted on 10/25/2006 2:53:25 AM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: kingu
"No judge, no where, will step into that minefield, especially after the SCOTUS's clear language that interfering in elections was something that courts were to avoid."

Bush v. Gore

19 posted on 10/25/2006 9:55:21 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: kingu
"No judge, no where, will step into that minefield, especially after the SCOTUS's clear language that interfering in elections was something that courts were to avoid."

Bush v. Gore

20 posted on 10/25/2006 9:55:21 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson