Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.J. Supreme Court to issue 'gay marriage' decision Wed.
Baptist Press ^ | 10/24/06

Posted on 10/24/2006 7:34:45 PM PDT by dukeman

TRENTON, N.J. (BP)--The New Jersey Supreme Court will issue its much-awaited decision on "gay marriage" on Wednesday at 3 p.m. EST, the court announced Tuesday afternoon.

The ruling by the seven-member court could make New Jersey the second state in the nation to legalize "gay marriage" -- a decision that almost certainly would have an impact on elections nationwide, particularly ones in the eight states considering constitutional marriage amendments. Massachusetts' highest court issued a decision in 2003 legalizing "gay marriage" there.

A ruling against "gay marriage" would be another major legal setback for homosexual activists in their quest to redefine marriage nationwide. They lost at the supreme court level in New York and Washington state earlier this year.

The ruling will be handed down on the last day that New Jersey Chief Justice Deborah Poritz is sitting on the bench. Under state law, justices must retire at age 70, which she turns on Thursday.

Homosexual activists are optimistic that the court will side with them. The New Jersey Supreme Court is the same one that in 1999 unanimously ruled that the Boy Scouts could not prevent homosexuals from becoming troop leaders. Poritz wrote the opinion. The decision was reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The "gay marriage" case is Lewis v. Harris.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/24/2006 7:34:45 PM PDT by dukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Portiz will retire and move somewhere else where she won't be bothered by gays.


2 posted on 10/24/2006 7:37:12 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
Previous Thread:

New Jersey Supreme Gay Marriage Decision being handed down ToMORrOW

 

3 posted on 10/24/2006 7:39:04 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
Tough for the court: if they pervert the law to let sodomists marry- like the Dems want- they fire up Republican voters.

They'll have to find some technicality to deny this one and then rule in favor of the sodomists in a case after the election.

4 posted on 10/24/2006 7:39:37 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
Democraps are an ungodly menagerie of com/symp socialist crooks, sex perverts, baby killers, child molesters, homosexuals, treasonous unpatriotic cut and run weak kneed enemy coddler's, trial lawyers, satanist/atheists, and imbeciles.

This decision will prove it.

5 posted on 10/24/2006 7:40:55 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

The Dems worst nightmare is if the New Jersey's supremes legalize gay marriage.


6 posted on 10/24/2006 7:41:08 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Rove you magnificent bastard!


7 posted on 10/24/2006 7:41:45 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
This decision will prove it.

Well, I am surprised they did not find a way to delay the decision. If they make the liberal pro-gay ruling right before the election, it will be a disaster for the Democrats.

8 posted on 10/24/2006 7:42:53 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The Dems worst nightmare is if the New Jersey's supremes legalize gay marriage.

Since the court is a judicial branch, vs a legislative branch, the court is unable to legalize gay marriage. The only thing that the court can find is that something is against the law. I suppose it's a minor issue, but a real one.
9 posted on 10/24/2006 7:44:00 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingu

yes, and that "something" is the state's denial to grant marriage to a same sex couple. if they rule that is against the law, gay marriage is in.


10 posted on 10/24/2006 7:46:28 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Iraq? What's Iraq?


11 posted on 10/24/2006 9:04:09 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson