[VxH]

 

>>The crux of this discussion revolves around the meaning of words and the intentions of the authors.

 

The crux is that he's not taking responsibility for the letter being written at all.

 

He'd better be able to prove that his enemies created this document - otherwise his political career is a non-starter.

[Amerigomag]

The crux is that he's not taking responsibility for the letter being written at all. He'd better be able to prove that his enemies created this document - otherwise his political career is a non-starter.

Here's the latest:

1) Defendant admits prior knowledge of the original letter.
2) Defendant asserts he did not compose or authorize distribution of the letter reviewed
3) Defendant asserts that his campaign has been effectively ended by the AG who confiscated his resources.
4) Defendant's antagonists have now switched to his recent residential change, a sign that defendant will prevail in the hate crime investigation.

[freedomdefender]

I heard him on the radio this evening. Thought he did pretty well. The hosts, John and Ken, seemed to think so, too.