Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amerigomag
 
>>The crux of this discussion revolves around the meaning of words and the intentions of the authors.
 
The crux is that he's not taking responsibility for the letter being written at all.
 
He'd better be able to prove that his enemies created this document - otherwise his political career is a non-starter.

97 posted on 10/25/2006 8:18:10 PM PDT by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: VxH
The crux is that he's not taking responsibility for the letter being written at all. He'd better be able to prove that his enemies created this document - otherwise his political career is a non-starter.

Here's the latest:

1) Defendant admits prior knowledge of the original letter.
2) Defendant asserts he did not compose or authorize distribution of the letter reviewed
3) Defendant asserts that his campaign has been effectively ended by the AG who confiscated his resources.
4) Defendant's antagonists have now switched to his recent residential change, a sign that defendant will prevail in the hate crime investigation.

98 posted on 10/25/2006 8:35:48 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: VxH

I heard him on the radio this evening. Thought he did pretty well. The hosts, John and Ken, seemed to think so, too.


100 posted on 10/25/2006 8:42:16 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson