Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiteGuy
Many who deal with this disease daily understand the challenges of the affects of their medication, and accept its limitations.

So it's perfectly OK that Fox, as he said in his own book, deliberately went off his meds before testifying to Congress so that he could better dramatize his condition? That's certainly a self-imposed 'limitation' on the effects of the medication but I consider it a clearly despicable one.

46 posted on 10/24/2006 4:14:02 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Bob

I bet he was on his meds when he wrote the book or he wouldnt have made a wooden nickle


85 posted on 10/24/2006 4:50:53 PM PDT by mickey blue eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Bob
So it's perfectly OK that Fox, as he said in his own book, deliberately went off his meds before testifying to Congress so that he could better dramatize his condition?

Of course.

Does the masking of pain with narcotics diminish the cause of the original pain?

Do the use of prosthetics to replace the body parts lost to disease somehow minimize the severity of the origin of the illness?

I'll answer again, YES, It is absolutely OK that Fox went without his medication to draw attention to a condition that affects so many Americans.
103 posted on 10/24/2006 5:42:03 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (DeWine ranked as one of the ten worst border security politicians - Human Events)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson