To: calcowgirl
They're going to have to refile as an election challenge - I just don't see how they'll get a court to agree to put in an injunction on this, not with voting already occurring. I think the merits of the case can win, but I just don't see it happening in time to matter.
Now, can someone explain to me why CALGOP isn't running ads bashing Brown over the head on this issue? 'Do you want an Attorney General who ignores the law?' The court of public opinion should be worked on right now. Otherwise, you'll have an angry electorate who will look at the challenge as being yet another 'overturning of their will.'
4 posted on
10/24/2006 1:47:15 PM PDT by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: kingu; ElkGroveDan
ElkGroveDan predicted that the game is for Arnold to appoint the AG after the election.
Unlike Poochigian, who is a straight shooter, whoever it is Arnold would appoint will make sure the elites in this state are never busted for the racketeering that is consuming its financial resources.
8 posted on
10/24/2006 2:02:14 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson