Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
Look. Peter Paul was hip deep in a Fundraiser for Hillary Clinton. God help him for being such an idiot. He wanted to "work" with Bill Clinton. God help him for being such an idiot. Now you say Stan Lee bet the farm on Bill Clinton and lost. God Help Him For BEING SUCH AN IDIOT.

Businesses take risks and sometimes those risks don't work out.

Perhaps they will all go to jail. Good for them.

Are you out there making a difference in the real world? How many campaign signs have you planted? How many calls have you made?

I was just disappointed in Stan Lee.. before you decided to take umbrage.. to my being bored with Stan Lee Media as a "Victim." Thats a pile of crap. They are big boys and business men do not normally expose themselves to this sort of risk. If they do and get burnt, then its their fault. Thats why consumer protection laws very rarely apply to business, because business people are suppose to know better.

If this is being handled by a prosecutor and it actually results in anything more the the first Peter Paul hot breath fest, then perhaps.. I will think.. ok.. now we can quit hearing about Hillary running for President. But the real world is that Hillary is just too hated to win. We all know her number.. and when she comes out to play.. we will play.

Now half of your thread is filled with how boring it is. I am sure this wasn't your plan.

36 posted on 10/24/2006 10:22:12 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: dalight; doug from upland
I've watched the movie short, and there's no painting of Stan Lee as a victim that I can see. Just because someone is stupid enough to get involved with the Clintons is no reason to keep the Clintons from getting into trouble for skirting (flouting?) election laws--and being shown to be the corrupt greedheads we know they are.

If Clinton promised to work w/Stan Lee, and Stan Lee went broke because Clinton didn't show up or otherwise interfered, Stan Lee will sue.

dalight--is there some reason you'd like to see the Clintons get off the hook? This is not the legal way that business is done.

doug-- If he's not afraid to sue, for some reason. Lee is highly litigious, as is Marvel. That might be an angle to investigate.

37 posted on 10/24/2006 10:54:05 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson