Where'd I say that, paulsen.
Read what I'd wrote again for chrissakes, get it straight & stay on topic man.
If you must comment on anything I post at least have the courtesy of responding to what was actually said by direct any & all criticism(s) where they're merited. In the context of what I'd said that'd be the citizens of Las Vegas *&* NV pols, IF, things went the way I suspect they could in the future, 'k?
If we cannot have freedom -- as the signers intended us to have as stated in the Constitution for The United States of America -- for whatever reason(s) however righteous or convoluted and if said freedom(s) cannot be practiced in ones own damned home as is often the case today on this ONE issue?
Then let there be a *place* people who DO enjoy behavior(s) [read: smoke rope] outside the mainstream to go for venting their shtick & let it be up to the citizen taxpayers of such a place be the ones deciding the matter.
Capiche.
Now you may mark it down in your little black book I'm -- albeit naively -- behind such a place being "a" Las Vegas.
If you don't care for my opin, tough.
Should a national referendum ever come up where we've the chance to cast our vote on the issue?
You paulsen may negate my "Yes" vote; but, that's the best you'll do, pal.
robert?
Has your [in]famous tunnel-vision finally caused you to become completely blind.
...geez. ;^)
I thought I was on topic. When you said, "What happens in Las Vegas, stays in Las Vegas", weren't you implying that "Drug use in Las Vegas stays in Las Vegas"?
If not, then perhaps you can clarify that for me.