To: SampleMan
Best case scenario is that we get legal guns/speech/religion, and the drug question is left up to the States, where it belongs.
448 posted on
10/31/2006 8:37:55 AM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Best case scenario is that we get legal guns/speech/religion, and the drug question is left up to the States, where it belongs. Well that's always been my position. But the drug question can't be left up to the states unless some states can constitutionally restrict it. So we are in agreement that the People of the states should be left to decide the matter of harm for themselves?
452 posted on
10/31/2006 8:58:33 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
To: tacticalogic; SampleMan
"Best case scenario is that we get legal guns/speech/religion, and the drug question is left up to the States, where it belongs."Why can't the guns/speech/religion decisions be made at the state level also, where the Founding Fathers originally intended they be made?
You're allowing those decisions to be made at the federal level, but not drugs. Why is that?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson