I've yet to hear anyone making the argument that I am. You are confusing the argument that drugs should be illegal with my argument that the decision should not be taken away from the People.
Pikes:
I withdraw the needless aspersion. Your point is, indeed, distinct from those of the prohibitionists.
Reverse the order of his points. In effect he claims that:
"-- the decision should not be taken away from the People --- ; --- that drugs should be illegal --"
We see a fine example of word gaming type sophistry.
I did not read his distinguishing statement as camoflaging an impulse to control.
Sample has made pretty clear that he believes the current drugs regime is injudicious, so I am prepared to believe that he is not being disingenuous or sophistical in this instance.
If the People are determined to install a tyrant, launching Constitution-based lawsuits will not stop them.