I don't believe you have answered any questions yet. Like tpaine, you are stuck in transmit mode.
You also have an inability to state your case forthwith. However, I think I get your point. You don't believe that anything that we can consume should be regulated. Bald Eagle is on the menu. The restriction of antibiotics, a requirement of keeping them at all effective, is unconstitutional. And impairment in public is a personal issue, unless someone is actually hurt (the its OK to do 120mph through a school zone, as long as no kids are hit argument).
Got it. Very few People share your definitions of "harm". As you have no kingly power to force everyone else to accept your views, and an inability to engage in constructive dialogue to change minds, you have a problem that isn't going to be rectified. I hope that you can find some other happiness in your life. You seem to have a knack for the obscure, self-absorbed, important sounding, but ultimately hollow statement. Perhaps a career at NPR awaits you.
Your view is that of a socialist democrat with no comprehension of the
Constitutional Republic that is our nation. Your idea of 'the people' centers
on some non-existent democratic majority, unless you count polls and trust
them to rule. Natural or God given rights are not at the whim of the majority
to deny to each individual making up the people.
Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the PEOPLE.
Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the PEOPLE.