You've come late to the discussion and I don't have the time or inclination for the remedial work of bringing you up to speed. You're wanting to counter an argument I'm not making. Please read my posts, its all there.
"You've come late to the discussion and I don't have the time or inclination for the remedial work of bringing you up to speed. You're wanting to counter an argument I'm not making. Please read my posts, its all there."
I read the entire thread before posting at #166 and followed it all the way. You answer little and attack a lot. Moreover, I quoted the part of your argument I wished to debate in each posted response.
Gee, it sure seemed like your comment I was responding to:
To: dirtboy
I think its stupid to legalize the possession of small amounts. It should either be legal or illegal. To legalize small amounts is like making stealing $5 legal.
I'm OK with a state legalizing pot if the majority of that state decides to, but I'm not OK with the concept that its a constitutional right.
I'm also OK with employers, including government (the electorate), having very broad rights in who they hire and fire, or otherwise hand out money to. If a man doesn't want to employ someone who smokes pot or drinks alcohol or smokes, that should be his business. Same goes for how government funds are spent.
Do what you want, but bare the consequences, might indeed be the best alternative to drug use.
37 posted on 10/23/2006 6:43:11 PM PDT by SampleMan (Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]