Posted on 10/23/2006 5:03:34 PM PDT by JTN
Illegal drugs are chemical warfare against the young people of this country since the 1960s. It is pure villainy...
Carolyn
Withdrawal pains?
Always happy to answer a question. No. And I've always believed that any law or constitution that requires a lawyer to understand, isn't worth the paper its printed on.
"I point out your hyperbole when you say that I'm no better than the Taliban. If that were true, you would be missing your head right now,"
You are no different than the Taliban and have still failed
to argue against that fact. You demand that your religious
views become state mandated. You disparage the belief of
others and conjure DEAmen to do your evil bidding masked in
the mystery of the whore of Babylon. It is not a wonder
that such a person as seeks to control other's lives down
to the minutae of personal consumption would resort to
veiled threats when confronted with a mind they have no
control over. Even an army of your DEAmen haven't the
power to change my mind nor take my head. They may take
my life for holding a remote control when thy break down
the door, but the words I speak are truth and it is eternal.
"no action with anything God gave us could be wrong"
I wrote no such thing. God made herb, saw that it was good
and gave it to man and animals alike for consumption.
He also said not to fight amongst yourselves over what one
consumes. Moreover, the heresy of evil substance installed
as a federally mandated religion is undeniably unconstitutional.
An herb is a plant part desired for its aromatic, savory or medicinal properties. Your illogical hypotheticals disregard this simple fact. If you wish to claim the logical stance then you should attempt to answer my first post to you. Explain how one can logically use the commerce
clause of the Constitution to attempt to ban a gift from God instead of adhering to the word of the law and protect THE PEOPLE by properly regulating the existing industry?
"Criminalizing actions that harm others is constitutional."
Smoking herb is not illegal, possessing it is illegal.
The right to be secure in your possessions is guaranteed
by the Constitution. Failing to regulate an industry which
supplies an herb for consumption while attempting to ban
the possession of that herb fails to protect the consumer.
The feds have abused their power and failed to do their duty.
Their puritanical crusade has blinded them, as you, to their
own evil actions of violence taken against others and
negligence in their duty.
Your supposition that harm is the basis of criminal law is
patently absurd. Alcohol causes many times the harm of
herb and yet it is legal. Comparing violent acts of one
against another to the possession of a gift from God is not
in any sense logical. You can repeat it as many times as
you like but it just exposes your ignorance.
Nice description of your posting style, thanks!
I have done a lot of damage to myself in the service of an ungrateful nation,... dcwusmc
I DON'T CARE... you are a villain... Sir Francis Dashwood
Welfare check late? -- Mojave
dcwusmc,
I wanted to thank you for your service to our country. The majority of your fellow citizens are not represented by the two jerks above.
Thanks again for your service.
01
I was a W-5... served at Ord, Benning, Campbell, Lewis, and Roberts...
"Most regular pot-smokers don't make good employees, if it comes to having godd QC, QA, or attendance (the voice of experience). The repercussions of that (potheads without jobs=public assistance)ourweigh the need to legalize maryjane."
Since herb makes inefficient chattel the socialist usurpation
requires the eradication of a gift from God and the
suppression of its possessors, protectors and propagators?
What is your notion of a free Republic?
Sure you don't want to include rubber and glue in that statement? It would seem appropriate.
Really? Patently absurd? Murder is not illegal because of the harm it does? Fascinating. If not harm, then criminal law would be based on what in your world?
This should be fascinating. PLEASE keep posting. No particular reason.
Actually, he's almost right. "Harm" is really hard to show in many cases and can be whatever someone claims it to be. The BEST baseline for crime is violation of rights, which are pretty easy to define objectively. Murder is, of course, the ultimate violation of rights.
Thank you for your civility. It's MOST refreshing.
Illicit drug use is a perk for claiming to have served?
Huh, learn something new everyday.
I guess someone has to stop using big words to explain things to you. I use what my VA doc gives me for pain. Because of asshats like you, she cannot give me what WORKS for me very often. Mostly I do without as I have to save my PRESCRIPTION drugs for the nights when it is worst. Like when it's a nine or ten on the scale. I sincerely hope and pray that you and your a-hole buddy, sir frank dashed-in-the head, come to have YOUR right arms almost severed so you can know what it's like. (Severed, by the way, means cut off. I forgot, you don't understand the big words.)
Dope?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.