Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
doug from upland said: "We have video testimony from Lee that he gave no money. "

Who has to sign the FEC report? Can't Lee challenge this himself? I would be upset if Hillary claimed that I had donated a dime to her campaign. What sort of consequences are attached to fraudulent or even just mistaken reports?

If these fraudulent reports are intended to falsify the record as a means of frustrating fact-finding in the civil trial, is this not potentially a conspiracy to obstruct justice? Somebody came up with a number to put with Stan Lee's name? Is the claim that Lee donated cash, or is it an "in-kind" contribution? Will the conspirators, if that is what they are, be able to claim that there was confusion as to who the contributor of the "in-kind" contribution was?

If Stan Lee Media was the presumed beneficiary of any later involvement by BJ Klinton, doesn't that make Stan Lee Media the contributor of "in-kind" contributions intended to win that later quid-pro-quo?

At the very least, the creation of the number suggests that somebody carried out a process which addressed what Lee's contribution was. Such a person could be expected to have some basis for such a decision. Perhaps this process is the equivalent to BJ's blue dress; that is, incontrovertible evidence that somebody associated with the campaign knew exactly what had transpired.

60 posted on 10/25/2006 10:15:59 AM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

Peter sent a facsimile to Lee a few days ago telling him that he has a legal obligation to correct the record. When I informed him several months ago, he was shocked. Yes, he has obligations relative to falsely naming him as a donor.

The treasurer signed the FEC report. The candidate has a clear legal responsibility if she knows that the treasurer is violating the law.

Stan Lee was claimed to have given an in-kind contribution --- paying for expenses to put on the event. They can claim confusion if they wish. Peter has done everything he could to get them to correct the record.

Hillary ordered her campaign treasurer to ask for more money, then had it illegal diverted to a state committee in New York --- the Working Families Party.

This really would be easier if you could watch the videos. :) Go to the library and use their computer.


63 posted on 10/25/2006 10:28:01 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson