A further question is; can a judge order Hillary to re-submit the declaration with the lie corrected?
Especially if there is an entire line of connected lies in the declaration, it would be quite a show to have her correct the declaration "one lie at a time". What entertainment.
As you have pointed out, I think, the fact that Hillary's campaign has had to file corrected statements of donations argues strongly for the fact that her campaign has been, at best, incompetent. Similarly, having to respond multiple times to a court's orders to correct falsehoods might get people's attention.
On a related note, isn't Kendall still Hillary's attorney? Doesn't he have a duty to the Bar to distance himself from illegal behavior? I recall that his role in this has been questioned. Do the facts support a challenge of his continued involvement? Wasn't it Bob Bennet that disappeared suddenly from BJ's side when the DNA made clear that perjury had been committed?
I don't know what the judge will do about the declaration when it is ripped to shreads.
We are going to be showing lie after lie in the declaration. Peter's home video is very damning.
When the press finally starts reporting on the fourth fraudulent filing she did in January and the evidence of the Clinton role if the collapse of Stan Lee Media, perhaps people will finally get it.
Kendall is still the attorney. For five years, he said the case had no merit and that Hillary fully cooperated. After the FEC determination and admission by her treasurer of 721K hidden, he has been strangely silent.
Kendall was served with the lawsuit on July 11, 2001. Included was documentation for $1.6 million spent by Peter and a demand that she report accurately. Nevertheless, his client allowed her treasurer (who had the same info on July 3) to file a third false FEC report on July 30, 2001.