Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
doug from upland said: "3. Next sentence she claims to have met Peter Paul in early 2000. "

She probably did meet him in 2000. Did she state in the declaration that she FIRST met him in 2000? Some liars are pretty clever when it comes to choosing words that have just enough ambiguity to permit alternate interpretations.

53 posted on 10/24/2006 8:58:13 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

re: first met

Peter and I laughed and discussed that when I first saw the declaraton on April 7i, 2006. Yes, Hillary can try to make the claim that she met him in early 2000. That would be a true statement, but for purposes of the declaration, she is going to have to do better than that.


56 posted on 10/24/2006 11:00:57 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson