[William Tell]

doug from upland said: "10. Her claim that she met Peter in 2000 is preposterous and a lie."

I gather that the significance of the lie is that Hillary would have been quite acquainted with Peter at the time that Peter supplied the "in-kind" contribution, thereby making it unreasonable to believe that Hillary did not know of the contribution that he made. Is that correct?

[doug from upland]

The significance is that she lied in the first statement in the declaration.