Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dianna

The specific instance I am thinking of and mentioned is the family home where the family actually uses the house for the family. (the son or daughter who moves in and did take care of mom or dad or both)

I don't think this is really an issue for envy politics.

There is no reason the successful should be more penalized that those who are not. It is the government's way of making everyone the same level of destitute.


132 posted on 10/23/2006 12:49:37 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
The specific instance I am thinking of and mentioned is the family home where the family actually uses the house for the family. (the son or daughter who moves in and did take care of mom or dad or both)

I think an adult child who has forgone income to care for the parents is a special case. There are ways to safeguard the home if that is necessary.

There is no reason the successful should be more penalized that those who are not. It is the government's way of making everyone the same level of destitute.

I think people should pay their bills. That some people do not, does not relieve me of my obligation. This is the freeloaders way of stealing from me to enrich their own pockets.

133 posted on 10/23/2006 12:58:58 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson