Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wmfights
Isn't the issue, who's assets are they. Should the state be able to take the assets of all relatives to pay for someone's care?

In this case the assets were the patients'. They were transferred to the relatives to avoid losing them to the state, as partial payment for long term care.

100 posted on 10/23/2006 11:49:40 AM PDT by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: 3niner
"In this case the assets were the patients'. They were transferred to the relatives to avoid losing them to the state, as partial payment for long term care."
______________________________

Since we're going to let the state decide to negate the transfer in this case what stops a govt. bureaucrat from reinterpreting the rules next time. Before you tell me it can't happen, the IRS does it all the time and the individual has to prove at his cost they are wrong.
140 posted on 10/23/2006 3:19:43 PM PDT by wmfights (Psalm : 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson