Skip to comments.
Gold futures fall as oil retreats, dollar rises
Market Watch ^
| October 23, 2006
| Ciara Linnane
Posted on 10/23/2006 7:31:57 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Gold futures fell early Monday, pulling other metals with them, as oil prices again retreated and the dollar strengthened ahead of a Federal Reserve decision on interest rates.
Gold for December delivery was last down $9.20 at $587.30 an ounce on the New York Mercantile Exchange. On Friday, the contract lost $6 of its value although it scored a modest gain for the week.
The metal was hurt by weak oil prices after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' production cut failed to convince oil traders it would be enough to halt a slide in prices.
"The rally of late last week appears to have been a one-day wonder, for the strength that developed Thursday vanished Friday and remains 'in-hiding,' " said Dennis Gartman, editor of The Gartman Letter.
(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot; GodGunsGuts
GGG
Aren't you paying 10% on your margin? You're not going to get far with a 12.5% return. After taxes, holding charges, spread, and commissions you'll see what... 1%? That's quite a get rich slow scheme you've got going! LOL!
To: Fan of Fiat
Down $20 since Friday. $1 an ounce per week carrying cost. Getting hard to make bank.
62
posted on
10/24/2006 7:29:59 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
To: hubbubhubbub
I thought you goldbugs were interested in the price of gold?
64
posted on
10/24/2006 10:05:01 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: Toddsterpatriot; Fan of Fiat; Petronski; winodog
"Since gold held at its first major support, I am encouraged greatly that we will be working our way through Angel #1 and #2 before the year is out." --Jim Sinclair
To: GodGunsGuts
As long as those angels keep using their magnets, you'll be breaking even any day now. LOL!
66
posted on
10/24/2006 11:43:20 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: GodGunsGuts
67
posted on
10/24/2006 11:43:55 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Weird angels, look more like roman surfer dudes with wings.
68
posted on
10/24/2006 11:44:59 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Dancing through life like a street mime with tourettes syndrome.)
To: Petronski
Tarot cards are probably a better predictor of the future than technical analysis. LOL!
69
posted on
10/24/2006 11:51:28 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: Toddsterpatriot; Petronski
TA combined with an understanding of fundamentals is a very potent combination.
To: GodGunsGuts
71
posted on
10/24/2006 1:36:49 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Not the everyday price. The trend is fine with me.
To: GodGunsGuts
TA combined with an understanding of fundamentalsThe fundamentals that prove gold is on the express train to $1650 in the next 4 years (if you ignore the recent 20% decline)?
73
posted on
10/24/2006 1:49:37 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: hubbubhubbub
The trend is fine with me.
You bet.
74
posted on
10/24/2006 1:52:42 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Finally... Goldbug propaganda I can agree with.
The "Angels" want gold to go to 1650, but since they lack basic intelligence, they don't realize that since gold is not magnetic, it's not going to move... Just sort of languish about racking up huge storage and margin costs.
To: Toddsterpatriot
In the scenario proposed--gold going to $1650--dollars would be essentially worthless, and copper-jacketed lead would become the most likely means of value transfer.
To: Fan of Fiat
Gold has been moving for the last five years. Obviously, those are no ordinary magnets d:op
To: Toddsterpatriot
I have recited them over and over to you.
To: GodGunsGuts
And they're nonsensical and illogical every time you recite them.
79
posted on
10/24/2006 3:02:56 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts. You know who you are.)
To: Petronski
If you think that witchcraft convinces anyone, you've got to believe I've never studied statistics and probability, or the efficient markets hypothesis. well those charts look pretty dead on.
it is really not witchcraft or even statistics but more a representation of human choice, emotion and action.
80
posted on
10/25/2006 2:21:44 PM PDT
by
alrea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson