Replies

" It is."

§ 2384. Seditious conspiracy (covers the Koran and the Imams that preach it)
§ 2386. Registration of certain organizations (covers Saudi-funded mosques)

"You mean to tell me you honestly believe muslims at West Point are a threat to our national security, but you are too lazy to punch 11 digits into a phone and at least find out what response you might get to the threat you believe you've so clearly identified? "

Boy have you missed the point of this whole exercise here.
The issue is NOT specific actions by specific people, but the misguided policies that allow modern-day Nazis admission to the USMA. All "moderate Muslims" I'm sure. Just like the 7/7 bombers before they "got religion". It is not required of US that we automatically trust THEM at this point. It is for THEM to PROVE themselves trustworthy. As it stands, they have not done so. They make no efforts towards that end. My comment on our lack of civilizational survival instinct is due to our leaderships utter inability to even NAME the enemy in this war due to the general PC-ness that has infected even "conservative" Republicans in office. As the FBI is being trained in "Muslim sensibilities" by the enemy in the person of CAIR, I don't see any recourse from that direction.

We WILL be attacked again. We WILL lose more civilians. Our government has even said so. However, they refuse to respond to this as if it actually was the war they say it is.

I'd no sooner trust a Muslim in any position of authority than a card-carrying member of the Communist Party. This doesn't mean an individual of either ideology is necessarily himself a threat.

"You are a one man tug of war between extreme cowardice and extreme hypocrisy. Unbelievable"

I'd really like to see you call me coward to my face.... We, I thought, had maintained a certain level of civility in this discussion. That's obviously beyond you.

"Seditious conspiracy"

By definition...an act.

"2386. Registration of certain organizations"

Um. That section is a description of who must register with the Attorney General, and it specifically excludes religious organizations.

"Boy have you missed the point of this whole exercise here."

Really? I believe I started "this whole exercise" when I asked for someone to provide legal justification West Point can use to exclude Muslims from West Point.

"I'd really like to see you call me coward to my face.... "

Really? You've spent post after post ranting about our government's refusal to act against an known enemy, but when I provide you with a means that you personally can use to take action, you refuse. You are either scared to dial the phone or you are a hypocrite. At this point, I suspect both. Don't just bow up. Prove me wrong.