[kinoxi]

Skinner's liberal, pro-abort lawyer used the Clintonian tactic to argue the meaning of "any person" and defended his client by saying the word meant "any one other than" Skinner.

So any law with the phrase 'any person' can be argued and appealed due to this cr**. How do these sick individuals attain such potions to begin with?

[kinoxi]

potions = positions
Typing with frustration.

[Beagle8U]

"How do these sick individuals attain such potions to begin with?"

By RATS getting elected to appoint them?

[Mad Dawg]

So any law with the phrase 'any person' can be argued and appealed due to this cr**. How do these sick individuals attain such po[si]tions to begin with?

Well, I wouldn't be surprised to discover that potions were involved.

I don't know how high up the food chain this case got, but it sounds like, worst case, it only has to do with Virginia. And my untutored guess is if a similar case ended up in front of a judge in another district or circuit, a more sensible interpretation of "any person" could be used, and then it would be appealed.I do want to say that I don't think it's right to dump on her lawyer. He's got to do the best he can defending her, and if he can persuade a judge to adopt an interpretation of the law favorable to his client, good on him. The fault is the judges' for falling for that stuff.