Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lots of money, time needed to move rails
San Antonio Express-News ^ | October 22, 2006 | Patrick Driscoll and Gary Scharrer

Posted on 10/22/2006 6:43:23 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

When a close call like last week's train derailment in Beacon Hill happens, the "what if" questions — as in what if a deadly poison had been released near so many homes — soon are followed by questions about what can be done.

But answers to how long it will take to reroute most trains out of San Antonio's core, how much it will cost and where the money will come from don't come easily.

And the best guesses on fixing the problem — a decade or more and billions of dollars — don't help people sleep much better.

"It's a very frightening situation," Mayor Phil Hardberger said. "We must move forward as fast as we can to get these rails out of San Antonio."

About 80 Union Pacific trains a day pass through the city, 50 of which could be rerouted if new tracks and rail yards were built, according to company.

Costs for tracks near Loop 1604 around the South Side and east of Interstate 35 to north of Austin could run $2 billion to $3 billion, said Patrick Marotta, a policy analyst with the Texas Department of Transportation.

"That's if we build it today," he said. "We're not going to build it today."

The first obstacle is money — there isn't any.

Voters last year approved the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement Fund, allowing the state to sell bonds to buy land and build and improve tracks. But the Legislature still needs to put money into it, and TxDOT suggested $200 million a year to back $2 billion in bonds.

"We thought $2 billion would be a good start to begin partnering with local entities and the private sector," said David Casteel, who heads TxDOT's San Antonio office.

Adding taxes to train fuel or freight has been discussed, but industry officials don't like those options, Casteel said.

Finding money could be tough in what likely will be another tight budget when state lawmakers return in January for their regular session.

Existing priorities include efforts to restore cuts made to the Children's Health Insurance Program and address shortages in the state's pension program for retired schoolteachers, said state Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio.

Lawmakers also face a growing demand to corral ever-increasing college tuition rates.

"The pressure is unbelievable to ease tuition escalation," Van de Putte said.

Recommended funding for rail relocations won't be known until December, said Rep. Ruth Jones McClendon, D-San Antonio, co-author of the measure that voters approved.

"I'm optimistic," she said. "This is the perfect example of what we need when something like this continues to happen."

Senate Finance Chairman Steve Ogden, R-Bryan, and House Appropriations Chairman Jim Pitts, R-Waxahachie, are likely to play big roles determining funding priorities. They didn't return phone calls.

San Antonio will need allies to get money for rail relocations, Van de Putte said.

"It's got to be perceived by my colleagues as more than just a San Antonio or Bexar County problem," she said.

TxDOT says it is more than a San Antonio problem, which ironically leads to another problem — other cities will vie for the same pot of money.

Relocating trains or at least separating rail and road crossings in urban areas, plus improvements to ease rail traffic congestion, would cost a whopping $16 billion, Marotta said.

"The state just can't provide all the necessary funds to relocate rail in communities," said Hope Andrade, a San Antonio resident serving on the five-member Texas Transportation Commission. "The future of anything we do is going to be public-private partnerships."

This is where state officials like to play their Trans-Texas Corridor card.

The Trans-Texas Corridor is a proposed 4,000-mile network of toll lanes, freight and passenger rail lines and utility lines that would criss-cross the state to handle growing international trade and population.

As envisioned, companies would finance most or all of the TTC in return for collecting tolls and user fees for 50 years.

A consortium led by Cintra of Spain and Zachry Construction Co. of San Antonio is willing to invest $6 billion to build new rail tracks from Dallas to Mexico, with construction starting in five to 10 years.

Rail companies have stated they won't pay to use the tracks unless they profit as well, but state officials say trains able to go 80 mph instead of trundling an average of 25 mph through cities will be a strong selling point.

"We believe in the power of the market," said Ric Williamson, chairman of the Texas Transportation Commission.

Bonds from the rail relocation fund and local money could be used to build links to Cintra-Zachry's proposed rail line, Williamson said. So could some of the $2 billion in concession fees from planned TTC toll lanes from San Antonio to Dallas.

Meanwhile, by bundling toll lanes, railways and utility lines together rather than putting them in separate rights of way, less land and money would be needed, he added.

"We have been saying this for four years," he said. "The whole idea is to combine the fixed costs to reduce the cost of each."

But that leads to another problem — a lot of people don't like the corridors.

Critics say companies would profit from tolls, gas stations and restaurants while communities would see their tax bases shrink and economic opportunities sucked away. Also, farmers and ranchers would be forced to give up land for the 1,200-foot-wide swaths, and some farm-to-market highways won't connect to the corridors while other roads won't even cross it.

"It's one of the most contested and intrusive concoctions known to Texans," Bexar County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson said. "The cheaper solution is for the railroad to fix the gosh darn tracks and establish procedures that will make for safer operations."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: austin; bexarcounty; centraltexasturnpike; cuespookymusic; loop1; rail; railrelocationfund; relocation; ricwilliamson; sanantonio; sh130; sh45; sh45north; texas; texas130; texas45; texas45north; transtexascorridor; traviscounty; ttc; ttc35; tx; txdot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Hydroshock
I disagree, as big of a land grab as this that will have tolls that last for decades needs to be put before the citizens of TX.

We do not get to do a three out of five, and then go for a six out of ten, and then a twelve out of twenty. The Texas Constitution has already been amended. We know that it is a bad idea to keep opening the Constitution. Valid challenges must go through the proper channels. Never bow down to the tyrants that can mobilize the largest mob. In this case, it is a small mob.

61 posted on 10/22/2006 3:49:08 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I think this road is not needed,



Why do you think that?....... Do you have statistics/forecast models that show the state population remaining stagnant or declining or that the increased import/export sector is going to stay at the current level or decline?.....

This country doesn't stay the same. If you did you'd be falling behind the rest of the states/world. Texas is going to continue to grow, population will increase and the import/export sector will grow all of which necessitate expanded transportation facilities. Now you have to plan today for something as big as major road/rail construction that will be built some years out in the future. The planning process takes several years, then a few more years of construction after the first shovel of dirt is turned before the route is ready for vehicle or rail traffic. Can't you understand that?


62 posted on 10/22/2006 4:06:11 PM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

A "what if" doesn't concern me anywhere near as much as trains blocking block after block of inner city Houston where little children have to climb between rail cars to get to school. How many rich white kids would have to lose a limb before something would be done?


63 posted on 10/22/2006 4:52:40 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Remembering Beirut Vets 1983 American Embassy April 1983/Marine Headquarters Oct.1983)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


64 posted on 10/22/2006 10:46:04 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Voters last year approved the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement Fund

The purpose of the bill was to help out some speculators in El Paso.

65 posted on 10/22/2006 11:42:29 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

You're welcome.


66 posted on 10/23/2006 4:42:59 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Non-smoker who hates smoking nazis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
"Too bad it doesn't run to the coast."


The commercial I was referring to was for the TTC (I35 twin), no where near the coast. Given the usual track of storms, the I69 road would be the worst of all possible evacuation routes, paralleling the coast the entire way.


Perhaps you would care to address some of my other concerns instead of 'nit picking'? The environment, resource depletion, cultural integrity and just for fun, how about not being able to spit without hitting your neighbor!
67 posted on 10/23/2006 4:59:19 AM PDT by wolfcreek (A personal attack is the reaction of an exhausted and/or disturbed mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Is it just my imagination or have you done a complete 180 on this issue? Seems to me you were against this at first.


68 posted on 10/23/2006 5:07:59 AM PDT by wolfcreek (A personal attack is the reaction of an exhausted and/or disturbed mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Seems to me you were against this at first.

I was. I attended two of the meetings, and wrote my legislator. After receiving the response, and researching the bills, it became very clear to me that the planted (and paid!) opposition that showed up each time has an agenda that is not in the best interest of Texas. Since each of the large metropolitan areas have bought into the concept in principle without mounting any sort of legal challenge, it seems that there is more cooperation and consideration than the opposition claims. Seriously, consider setting up a 30 minute phone call or meeting with your state representative or better yet write them a letter outlining your concerns. If done in a polite and sincere manner, you will get a response. Attend your next county commissioners meeting. You may be surprised at how far they are going to defend the rights of Texans, while still planning for the economic growth of Texas. If you have specific comments or questions on TTC-35, you can go here : http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/comments_questions/ttc-35_comments.htm On TTC-69, go here: http://www.keeptexasmoving.org/comments_questions/comments_i69.asp

Once again, polite and sincere questions get answered. Cutting and pasting rhetoric from a Strayhorn sponsored site will guarantee a "canned" reply.

69 posted on 10/23/2006 8:46:49 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson