Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chuck Dent

Isn't it clear that genetically modifying non-human organisms by giving them human genes, or creating human-animal chimeras or hybrids, would be immoral in itself? Why must we accept this as inevitable ("the time is quickly coming" "within our lifetimes")?

I do not want to live in a world with genetically altered, quasi-human "pets, slaves, and others." Can nothing stop this? Or do we have to wait for the Allah-Fubar Jihadists to stop it for us?

Ha. That would be ironic, hey? Allah-Fubar saving us from Humano-Fubar?


136 posted on 10/25/2006 9:48:22 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Sorry: Tag-line presently at the dry cleaners. Please find suitable bumper-sticker instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
Why must we accept this as inevitable

And yet, why must it be inevitably immoral?

My guess is if it is in our power to do something, there is a 99% likelihood that someone will try it. There is some kind of inevitability involved in that (akrasia). The more difficult question, however, is not about inevitability. It asks, when anything happens--inevitable or not--whether it ought to have happened, and when it does happen, to insist that it is wrong.

I confess I see something beautiful in Cyrano and it isn't his nose.

137 posted on 10/25/2006 10:09:57 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson