Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The problem is in the last paragraph:

Cheney also said that gasoline prices today, adjusted for inflation, are about what they were in the early part of the last century."

Should read LATE part of the last century.

I posted a comment to the story, and UPI may fix it.

1 posted on 10/20/2006 6:09:52 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: paulat

To beat thev lefties to the punch:

With a name like Eric Cheney, there just HAS to be a Haliburton - BushHitler connection, therefore making this whole article a lie to give more tax money to Big Oil.

;-)

/snarkiness off


2 posted on 10/20/2006 6:15:08 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

If a geologist named Gold is correct, and there is evidence that he is, the earth is still making oil so what we have now isn't all there will be.


3 posted on 10/20/2006 6:17:27 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

I think you are wrong since the Model T began production in 1908. It is now 2006. Early part of last century is correct.


4 posted on 10/20/2006 6:18:58 PM PDT by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

Oil has always been created. That is why we can mine it. The consumption seems to be overtaking the replenishment process. I like nukes.


5 posted on 10/20/2006 6:21:52 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat
adjusted for inflation, are about what they were in the early part of the last century."

Should read LATE part of the last century.

Actually, neither is correct.


6 posted on 10/20/2006 6:22:06 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

I'm old enough to remember the 50's. Gas was about 20 cents and my dad's yearly income was about 15K. (upper middle class in Texas)

Move the decimals on both one to the right and you have my husband and me with about the same standard of living today as then. (That first color TV was about 1/3 of a car then!)


7 posted on 10/20/2006 6:22:47 PM PDT by Mrs.Z (Mrs.Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

I've said for years, "the world is awash in oil"

It's good to have others with more specific knowledge and more infored opinions confirm that.


10 posted on 10/20/2006 6:25:12 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/peak_oil/is_peak_oil_a_myth.htm ---

Finally, a word of caution on the essential fragility of a study on the very long-term future for the world's energy supply which accepts without question the validity of the original 18th century hypothesis that all oil and gas resources have been generated from biological matter in the chemical and thermodynamic environments of the earth's crust. There is an alternative theory - already 50 years old - which suggests an inorganic origin for additional oil and gas. This alternative view is widely accepted in the countries of the former Soviet Union where, it is claimed, "large volumes of hydrocarbons are being produced from the pre-Cambrian crystalline basement".

Recent applications of the inorganic theory have, however, also led to claims for the possibility of the Middle East fields being able to produce oil "forever" and to the concept of repleting oil and gas fields in the gulf of Mexico. More generally, it is argued, "all giant fields are most logically explained by inorganic theory because simple calculations of potential hydrocarbon contents in sediments shows that organic materials are too few to supply the volumes of petroleum involved."

****

12 posted on 10/20/2006 6:26:17 PM PDT by beyond the sea ( Either hold your nose a little on Election Day ......... or grab your ankles for the next years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; thackney

Peak Oil Ping


13 posted on 10/20/2006 6:26:20 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

OMG - you mean the world is not coming to an END!!!!!


17 posted on 10/20/2006 6:31:22 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

I also read somewhere that a bunch of Russian scientists published a paper that says oil might also be a renewable resource.


21 posted on 10/20/2006 6:36:24 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat
Actually we have 57.8 quadrillion barrels of oil in the earth presently so it will be a while before we run out.

Someday, we are going to tunnel to the core of the earth. We won't find any oil there but it will solve our heating problems for a while.

22 posted on 10/20/2006 6:38:11 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (The Program is Morally Good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

He's a Cheney, part of the HAAAAAAAAliburton conspiracy ... /sarc


27 posted on 10/20/2006 6:46:16 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat
"The most common question I get is, 'When are we going to run out of oil?' The correct response is, 'Never,'" said Cheney. "It might be a heck of a lot more expensive than it is now, but there will always be some oil available at a price, perhaps $10 to $100 a gallon."

Did he really say "gallon" and not barrel? I thought that's where the error was.

31 posted on 10/20/2006 7:14:01 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat

Another theory is that 90% of living biomass on the planet is in the form of bacteria in the soil and earth. It has been postulated that the bacteria in the ocean crust is producing the oil.


32 posted on 10/20/2006 7:27:24 PM PDT by pwatson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat
>>
"The most common question I get is, 'When are we going to run out of oil?' The correct response is, 'Never,'"
<<

I would respectfully suggest that the correct answer is that the issue is the price of hydrocarbons in suitable forms and quantities. We will never run out. Indeed, we are awash in hydrocarbons that can be refined and converted into any other form we need. The only question is cost.

It appears we have run out of crude that only costs the Saudis $5/bbl to pump out. But given a high enough market price per barrel, we have more hydrocarbons in the form of coal under Illinois than the Saudis have in all their oil.

Even sewage sludge and waste from turkey slaughtering can be converted into biodiesel at no more than the present retail price.
35 posted on 10/20/2006 8:01:25 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: paulat
'When are we going to run out of oil?'

This strawman continues to live and breathe even though demolished, squashed, and incinerated over and over.

45 posted on 10/21/2006 9:52:25 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson