[DBrow]

I saw it, and read it too.

So it's true if it's on the news and YouTube? By that logic Bush had demolition charges planted in WTC! I saw it on YouTube and several college professors corroborated it!

Look at the video and look for visuals that prove what the voice is saying is true. The video stops and starts, while buttons are pressed, and after several more stops and starts, the paper tape comes up with numbers, that don't match the buttons that were pressed- but the stops and starts mean that the final result could be merely editing. Also, there are no visible security seals like a real fielded machine would have. The report is full of statements like "could be done", "may be done", "it is possible to..."

As for the magic code, find a description of any code that deletes itself without a trace, or human intervention. I know of no example, except for some LISP code, but deletion leaves a trace.

[longtermmemmory]

no but if a this professor is able to perform a real time demonstration of the process then it is something for concern.

The solution Diebold is using is to randomly pull terminals from the line up and test them to see if they are recording votes correctly. Essentially sacrifice random terminals to ensure there is no malicious code installed.

This is no different than the Rush limbaugh video showing how a simple wire throu a stack of punch cards can sway an election result.


We must be vigilant to tampering.