Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard

Which is more than the Democrats would do. Of course, nothing plus nothing equals...


104 posted on 10/19/2006 9:27:45 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


BUMP


105 posted on 10/19/2006 9:33:53 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Murtha needs a swift BOOT ad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: oneamericanvoice
I am actually writing a law review note on whether or not the New York Times can be prosecuted for publishing classified information under the Espionage Act. As of now, after doing careful research, I am leaning toward saying the statutes can apply to the New York Times' actions and that such a reading of the statute would withstand constitutional scrutiny. It is close, but I think it can be done. The problem is the Bush administration doesn't have the balls to do so. As far as government employees go, the espionage statutes can not be any clearer. According to United States v. Morison (defendant was half government employee / half journalist), such a prosecution is clearly allowable under the statutes and such a prosecution is also constitutional
107 posted on 10/19/2006 9:39:33 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson